Of the 64 individuals arrested during the large-scale security operation, 36 will not face any charges, yet the force stands by its decisions.

The Metropolitan Police has doubled down on its controversial decision to arrest 64 individuals during the security operation surrounding the coronation of King Charles III, despite over half of those arrested now facing no further action. Of the 64 arrests made in the lead-up to the historic event, 36 have been released without charges, raising questions about the necessity and fairness of the police response to potential threats.

The operation, described by the police as a critical part of ensuring public safety during the high-profile occasion, saw a significant number of arrests related to suspected public order offences, including those accused of planning to disrupt the coronation. However, following further investigations, it was determined that many of the individuals detained had not committed any crimes, and their cases were subsequently dropped.

The high number of no further action decisions has sparked debate, with critics questioning whether the police overstepped their authority and disproportionately targeted protesters and activists. There have been particular concerns about the arrests of individuals associated with anti-monarchy groups, some of whom were detained simply for holding placards or engaging in peaceful demonstrations.

In response to the public outcry, the Met Police has defended its actions, stating that the arrests were made based on intelligence and potential risks to public safety during an event of such national significance. “The safety and security of the public were our highest priority,” said a spokesperson for the force. “While not all arrests resulted in charges, the operation was carried out with the aim of preventing any disruptions to the coronation, which was a momentous occasion for the country.”

The controversy surrounding the arrests has raised broader concerns about the balance between maintaining public order and protecting the right to protest. Human rights organizations have called for a review of the police’s tactics, urging greater transparency and accountability in the handling of such large-scale security operations.

As investigations continue into the remaining cases, the question of whether the police response was justified will likely remain a subject of scrutiny, with many calling for reforms to ensure that the actions of law enforcement remain proportionate and respectful of citizens’ rights.