Opposition claims proposed measures would exclude millions of struggling families from essential support

Liz Truss’s proposed measures to address the cost-of-living crisis have been criticised by Labour, which claims they would leave nearly four million families without adequate support. Labour argues that the plans, reportedly focused on targeted assistance for those on benefits, would fail to reach many families with children.

Truss has pledged “decisive action” and “immediate support” should she become Prime Minister, including reversing the national insurance hike and cutting green levies on energy bills. However, she has avoided revealing full details, citing the need to review ongoing analyses in Whitehall.

Labour’s calculations, based on reports that Truss’s plan prioritises the poorest households and pensioners, suggest that millions of families earning modest incomes would miss out. For instance, a couple earning average wages with one child outside London would not qualify for aid, while nearly 100 regions, including Darlington and Colchester, would see working families left unsupported.

In contrast, Labour champions its own energy bill freeze, claiming it would save minimum-wage earners over £40 weekly this winter. While critics have challenged the party’s cost estimates, Labour asserts its plan is thoroughly researched with Ofgem’s input. Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves said, “This Government’s failure to act has left households facing soaring bills. Labour’s plan offers real relief, and the Government should adopt it without delay.”

As the energy crisis deepens, the debate over effective solutions continues, with millions of families anxiously awaiting meaningful intervention.