Black Lawmakers Protest the Move, Calling the Justice’s Legacy Harmful to African Americans
The Republican-controlled Senate of Georgia has voted in favour of erecting a monument to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, a decision that has sparked strong objections from several Black lawmakers. The proposed monument, which would be funded by private donations, is slated to be placed at the state Capitol if it clears the House vote. The approval was made by a 32-21 vote and now moves forward for further consideration.
Thomas, a Georgia native who was appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1991 by President George H.W. Bush, has been one of the most conservative justices for over three decades. However, his stance on key issues, including abortion rights and affirmative action, has drawn sharp criticism, particularly from Democratic senators. State Senator Nikki Merritt, a Black lawmaker, condemned Thomas as a “hypocrite and a traitor,” arguing that his rulings have consistently undermined the struggles of African Americans. Merritt also highlighted the sexual harassment allegations made against him during his 1991 confirmation hearing, which he denied.
The proposal has divided opinions within the state legislature. Supporters of the monument, such as Republican State Senator Ben Watson, argue that Thomas’ life story—his rise from poverty in Georgia to the Supreme Court—is worthy of recognition, regardless of political views. Watson compared Thomas to former President Jimmy Carter, noting that both figures had significant impacts on Georgia and the nation.
Opponents, however, argue that it is premature to honour Thomas with a statue while he remains an active justice. State Senator Nan Orrock warned that placing a statue of someone still in office could be problematic if their legacy changes over time. “You don’t want to be pulling it down later if things go badly,” Orrock said.
As the bill proceeds to the House for further debate, the issue of whether or not to honour Thomas remains contentious, reflecting deeper divides over his judicial decisions and their impact on African American communities.
