Mike_Smith

Total Post: 1483

Historic Old Red Lion Theatre Pub Changes Hands After 25 Years

Historic Old Red Lion Theatre Pub Changes Hands After 25 Years

Actor Couple Takes Over Iconic Islington Venue, Ensuring Its Cultural Legacy

A beloved Islington landmark, the Old Red Lion Theatre Pub, has been sold after 25 years under the same ownership, securing its future as both a historic pub and a thriving theatre space.

A New Era for a London Institution
Originally listed for sale at £450,000, the Grade II-listed pub has now been acquired by Cowardly Theatre Limited, a company run by actors Janine Duvitski and Paul Bentall. The deal includes the pub, a 50-seat theatre, a two-bedroom flat, two bedsits, and a trade kitchen, all leased for 15 years from freeholder Star Pubs & Bars.

Dating back to 1415, the Old Red Lion has a long history as a public house, while the theatre, established in 1979, has helped launch the careers of numerous playwrights and performers, including Kathy Burke, Nina Raine, and Abi Morgan.

Securing the Theatre’s Future
The sale comes after concerns from the artistic community that the building’s cultural significance might be lost. Last year, artistic director Jack Robertson emphasised the need for stability rather than rescue efforts.

With the purchase now finalised, Robertson will remain in his role, and the pub and theatre will continue to operate, with Duvitski and Bentall’s daughter and son-in-law managing the venue.

“They plan to make subtle design changes while preserving its Victorian charm,” said Robertson, adding that the theatre will expand its role as a producing house.

A Persistent Journey to New Ownership
Previous owner Damien Devine had initially listed the pub for sale in 2019, but complications—including a change in freehold ownership, lease negotiations, and the pandemic’s impact on live theatre—delayed the process.

Significant renovations, including roof repairs and façade restoration, were completed before the sale, ensuring the building remains structurally sound for its new owners.

Simon Chaplin, of selling agents Christie & Co, described the transaction as a “tale of persistence”, ultimately resulting in a fitting outcome for one of London’s most cherished venues.

With the Old Red Lion now under new management, its legacy as a centre for arts and community remains intact, promising an exciting new chapter for both the pub and its theatre.

Luton Airport Expansion Approved Despite Environmental Opposition

Luton Airport Expansion Approved Despite Environmental Opposition

Government Overrules Concerns to Nearly Double Passenger Capacity by 2040

Luton Airport has secured government approval to increase its passenger capacity from 17 million to 32 million annually by 2040, a decision that defies environmental objections and prioritises aviation growth.

Expansion Plans Move Forward
Despite warnings from environmental groups and recommendations against the project from the Planning Inspectorate, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander gave the green light for the expansion. The project does not involve a second runway, but it includes terminal extensions, improved taxiways, and infrastructure upgrades to handle the additional traffic.

The expansion would result in 77,000 more annual take-offs and landings, averaging 211 additional flights per day. This decision aligns with previous government support for airport expansions at Heathrow and Gatwick, reinforcing the UK’s commitment to growing its aviation sector.

Opposition and Economic Implications
Critics argue that the increase in flights will contribute to carbon emissions, noise pollution, and traffic congestion. Green Party MP Sian Berry condemned the approval, calling it a “disastrous” decision that could harm coastal communities by diverting tourism spending abroad.

“The government should be supporting domestic tourism and sustainable travel rather than expanding airports,” Berry said, suggesting that a frequent flyer levy would be a more responsible economic approach.

However, Luton Airport CEO Alberto Martin defended the decision, highlighting the £2.4 billion investment and the potential job creation in the region. He also revealed that the expansion could enable new flight routes, including services to the Middle East.

Industry Growth and Local Opposition
The announcement coincides with Jet2 launching flights from Luton for the first time, joining easyJet, Ryanair, and Wizz Air as major operators at the airport.

Meanwhile, local campaign group Ladacan continues to resist the project, citing concerns about air pollution, noise levels, and traffic congestion.

With the government firmly backing aviation expansion, the debate over balancing economic benefits with environmental responsibility is far from over.

Campaigners Condemn Decision to Scrap Royal Parks Police

Campaigners Condemn Decision to Scrap Royal Parks Police

Scotland Yard Faces Staff Cuts Amid £260m Budget Crisis

The decision to disband the Royal Parks police unit has been met with strong criticism from campaigners, who describe it as short-sighted and damaging to public safety.

Scotland Yard is set to cut 1,700 officers, staff, and community support personnel due to a £260 million budget shortfall. Among those affected, 80 officers responsible for policing eight of London’s Royal Parks will be reassigned to local ward teams.

The unit plays a crucial role in enforcing wildlife laws, managing large public gatherings, and ensuring security at high-profile locations such as Hyde Park, St James’s Park, and Kensington Gardens. Critics, including local councils and former London Assembly members, warn that losing these specialised officers will compromise safety for both residents and visitors.

Councillor Gareth Roberts of Richmond Council called the decision a “very bad move,” arguing that Royal Parks officers possess unique expertise that cannot simply be absorbed into broader local policing teams. Former Assembly Member Tony Devenish also voiced concerns, stating that the cuts could make London feel less secure and discourage tourism.

The Met Police acknowledges the difficult choices being made, with reductions also affecting mounted patrols, cold case investigations, and anti-robbery squads. The Dogs Unit is set to shrink, while officers stationed in schools face redundancy.

Despite a record £1.16 billion investment by City Hall, Mayor Sadiq Khan has been criticised for not preventing the cuts. His administration insists that emergency response teams will remain untouched, but opponents argue that the loss of officers will have severe consequences for policing in the capital.

The Met Police is continuing discussions on the scale of the reductions, with some cuts potentially being reconsidered following an additional £32 million in funding.

Influencer Seeks £1.7m in Damages Over Allegedly Oversized Implants

Influencer Seeks £1.7m in Damages Over Allegedly Oversized Implants

Danielle Mansutti Sues Surgeon, Claiming Botched Surgery Ended Her Career

YouTube influencer Danielle Mansutti is suing Harley Street plastic surgeon Dr Domenico Mileto for £1.7m, alleging that oversized breast implants left her “disfigured” and forced her to abandon her social media career.

The 30-year-old, who amassed 1.6 million subscribers with beauty and lifestyle content, underwent three surgeries between December 2020 and May 2021 after experiencing complications. She claims that the implants were too large for her petite frame, leading to muscle damage and asymmetry.

Despite corrective procedures, Mansutti ultimately had the implants removed but says she was left with significant scarring and chronic pain. She argues that Dr Mileto failed to provide adequate advice on the risks associated with the implant size.

The surgeon, however, denies any wrongdoing, insisting that Mansutti was given the opportunity to choose implant sizes and that the procedure was performed correctly.

Legal proceedings are ongoing, with the High Court set to hear expert testimony regarding the medical and financial implications of the case.

Major Bill Increases Hit Londoners as April Tax Changes Set to Cost Families Thousands

Major Bill Increases Hit Londoners as April Tax Changes Set to Cost Families Thousands

From council tax to energy bills, households face steep rises with some expected to lose over £3,500 due to tax adjustments.

Londoners are bracing for substantial bill hikes starting in April, with essential services like energy, water, and council tax set to rise significantly. These increases, set to take effect on what is being referred to as “April Cruel Day,” are expected to add around £400 to the annual household budget.

Across the capital, council tax, water, energy, and broadband bills are all scheduled to go up, with some families seeing their costs spike by hundreds of pounds. The rise in energy bills, for instance, will add £111 to the average household’s annual costs, as Ofgem increases the price cap for the third consecutive quarter. This hike is primarily due to higher wholesale energy prices caused by cold weather and a shortfall in renewable generation.

In addition to the energy price increase, Thames Water customers will face a 31% rise in their bills, translating to an additional £203 annually. Furthermore, millions of households are also seeing their council tax bills increase, with a significant portion of London boroughs seeing charges exceed £2,000 a year.

The Conservative Party has forecast that due to National Insurance increases coming into effect on April 6, working families could lose over £3,500 each over the course of the Parliament. This is on top of the ongoing pressure from rising living costs. Citizens Advice has warned that the impact of these unavoidable costs is already stretching the finances of the lowest-income households, with some spending as much as 41% of their earnings on essential services.

Amid these increases, however, some workers will see the minimum wage rise by nearly 7%, potentially easing the strain for low-income earners. The new National Living Wage will rise to £12.21 an hour for those over 21, offering a potential lifeline to millions.

As the new tax year begins, families already dealing with the prolonged cost of living crisis now face additional challenges. The changes, combined with the broader economic climate, have led to warnings about the affordability of basic necessities, with some experts calling for stronger support measures to protect vulnerable households.

Veterinary Nurse Banned for Repeatedly Stealing Medication and Endangering Animal Welfare

Veterinary Nurse Banned for Repeatedly Stealing Medication and Endangering Animal Welfare

Dayna Johnson struck off after stealing drugs from multiple vet clinics and displaying unprofessional behaviour during surgeries.

A veterinary nurse from Bristol has been struck off after being found guilty of repeatedly stealing drugs intended for animals and displaying unprofessional conduct during surgeries. Dayna Johnson’s actions were deemed a serious breach of veterinary ethics, with the disciplinary committee ruling her unfit to practice.

Johnson, who worked at four different veterinary practices over a period of five years, was found to have stolen drugs, including methadone and buprenorphine, from the clinics. Her behaviour, which occurred on five separate occasions, was described as sustained and repeated by the committee.

During her time at Yatton Vets in September 2023, Johnson, while assisting in a dental surgery, appeared lethargic and nearly fell asleep on a spaniel. When questioned by a colleague, she attributed her condition to nervousness from starting a new job and lack of sleep. Despite this, her performance deteriorated, with Johnson failing to write legible notes and nearly collapsing on the animal during the procedure.

The following month, Johnson was caught stealing buprenorphine from the Bristol PDSA Pet Hospital, where she had started working after her previous job offer was rescinded due to earlier theft charges. She lied to her colleagues, claiming another surgeon had authorised the drug for the dog. In addition to this, she had previously stolen methadone while working at Vets4Pets in December 2022.

At Langford Small Animal Hospital in August 2023, Johnson’s inappropriate behaviour escalated when she was caught taking a syringe of methadone that was intended for a cocker spaniel’s joint surgery. A colleague observed Johnson’s erratic behaviour and witnessed her intentionally knocking the syringe to the floor before replacing it with another syringe filled with an unknown substance.

Johnson’s actions, which put both animal welfare and colleague trust at risk, were condemned by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, which stressed the importance of honesty, integrity, and responsible drug use in the profession. The committee found that Johnson’s actions breached the fundamental principles of veterinary care, including the promotion of animal welfare and the responsible use of controlled substances.

In December 2023, Johnson pleaded guilty to theft by employee and was fined. Despite being given a conditional caution by the police, she continued to steal drugs from her workplace. Following the ruling, she has been officially banned from practising as a veterinary nurse, bringing an end to her career in animal care.

Judge Orders Action Over ‘Psychological Torture’ Caused by Noisy Buskers in Leicester Square

Judge Orders Action Over ‘Psychological Torture’ Caused by Noisy Buskers in Leicester Square

A court ruling demands Westminster City Council address persistent noise complaints from buskers disturbing workers at Global Radio.

A judge has ruled that the noise generated by buskers performing in Leicester Square, especially with repetitive songs on loop, constitutes “psychological torture” for workers in the area. The case was brought to court by Global Radio, whose staff, including employees from well-known stations such as Heart, Capital, and Classic FM, have been enduring the loud music daily.

District Judge John Law ruled that Westminster City Council had failed to address the noise nuisance caused by these buskers. The judge described the situation as a “nuisance” exacerbated by the repetitiveness and poor quality of some performances. He likened the impact of these repetitive sounds to psychological torture techniques used in unlawful practices.

The court heard testimony from Global Radio staff, who described the impact of the noise on their ability to work. Employees reported being unable to hold conversations, hearing loud performances from within their offices, and even seeking refuge in cupboards or wearing headphones to escape the sound.

One worker, Charlotte Jacob, testified that she could not communicate with a colleague sitting only three metres away due to the loud singing of “Hallelujah.” Another, Michelle Gammon, stated that the noise was so intrusive that she could hear it in the building’s bathrooms.

Global Radio has been at the forefront of legal action against the busking noise, accusing Westminster City Council of failing to act since a 2021 regulation was introduced to manage street performances in the area. The company argued that this is the first legal case of its kind under the Environmental Protection Act 1990, typically used to tackle issues like flytipping, to address noise nuisance in public spaces.

A spokesperson for the council responded by acknowledging the concerns and vowed to find a balance between addressing the nuisance while ensuring street performers can continue contributing to the vibrant atmosphere of Westminster.

The case continues to highlight ongoing tensions between public entertainment and the quality of life for businesses and workers in iconic locations like Leicester Square.

Legal Dispute Over Coleen Rooney’s Legal Costs Continues After Vardy’s Appeal

Legal Dispute Over Coleen Rooney’s Legal Costs Continues After Vardy’s Appeal

Rebekah Vardy’s lawyers argue that Coleen Rooney understated her costs in the Wagatha Christie case, seeking a reduction in fees.

Rebekah Vardy’s legal team has accused Coleen Rooney’s lawyers of serious misconduct in a continuing dispute over legal costs from the ‘Wagatha Christie’ libel case. Vardy, who lost the 2022 high-profile defamation case, was ordered to pay over £1.8 million to Rooney for 90% of her legal fees. However, Vardy’s legal team is challenging the amount, alleging that Rooney deliberately understated her costs during an earlier hearing.

During the October 2024 hearing, Vardy’s barristers claimed that the costs submitted by Rooney were misleading, accusing her legal team of “serious misconduct” in understating their costs. Despite these claims, a judge ruled there had been no misconduct.

However, in a fresh appeal, Jamie Carpenter KC, representing Vardy, argued that Rooney had substantially understated her legal costs by around 40% in a budget document, presenting an incorrect figure to the court. Carpenter contended that Rooney’s legal team concealed the true costs from both Vardy and the court during the budgeting process.

Carpenter also suggested that a “proportionate sanction” would be to limit the amount Vardy should pay towards Rooney’s legal fees to £220,955.07 for costs incurred up until August 2021.

Rooney, who is married to former England captain Wayne Rooney, has strongly opposed the appeal. Her legal team insists there is no basis for the misconduct claims, arguing that the budget submitted was not intended to be an accurate representation of total costs but rather a guideline for reasonable and proportionate legal expenses.

The legal dispute stems from a 2019 accusation by Rooney that Vardy had leaked her private information to the press, which was deemed “substantially true” by the court in 2022. As a result, Vardy was ordered to pay a significant portion of Rooney’s legal fees.

The case continues to unfold, with both sides still locked in a bitter battle over the financial aspects of the case. The hearing is expected to conclude shortly, but the dispute over legal costs remains unresolved.

Discover the ‘Notswolds’: The Hidden Gem Near London Offering Cotswolds Charm Without the Premium

Discover the ‘Notswolds’: The Hidden Gem Near London Offering Cotswolds Charm Without the Premium

The Welland Valley Provides Affordable Countryside Living with Easy Access to the Capital

Nestled between Leicestershire and Northamptonshire, the Welland Valley offers an idyllic alternative to the expensive Cotswolds, making it an attractive option for those seeking picturesque countryside living without the hefty price tag. Often referred to as the ‘Notswolds’, this hidden gem boasts stunning scenery, a rich history, and a strong sense of community, all just an hour away from London by train.

Ellie Uppal, a local resident who grew up in Great Easton, is a passionate advocate for the area. After returning from studying at Oakham School and Nottingham Trent University, Ellie joined the Three Goats, a small hospitality group, to help develop The Nevill Arms, a boutique country hotel and pub in the charming village of Medbourne. “This region is full of character,” says Ellie, “though people often overlook it in favour of more famous destinations like Cornwall. The Welland Valley has a lot to offer.”

While the exact boundaries of the Welland Valley are debated, the stretch between Market Harborough and Harringworth is considered its heart. Medbourne, with its thatched houses, stone buildings, and community spirit, epitomises the charm of the area. Ellie points out the village’s strong sense of camaraderie, with many residents working from home or commuting to London. Local amenities, including a village hall, sports club, and shop, ensure a balanced rural lifestyle, while Market Harborough and Uppingham provide easy access to additional services.

The region is highly accessible, with London being just under an hour away by train from Market Harborough. Other nearby stations, such as Corby, Kettering, and Peterborough, offer even more options for commuters. Tom Wilson from estate agents King West highlights the area’s connectivity as one of its greatest assets. “London is less than an hour away, but we also have easy access to other major stations, making it ideal for commuters,” he explains.

The Welland Valley is also known for its excellent schools, with prestigious institutions like Uppingham, Oakham, and Rugby just a short drive away. This, combined with the affordable housing market, makes it a popular choice for families. The average property prices in Leicestershire and Northamptonshire are significantly lower than in the South East or London, making the area an attractive alternative for those looking to get more value for their money.

Ben Cripps, a local property developer, believes the region’s central location is perfect for families with relatives spread across the country. “Whether it’s your parents or your children, no one is ever too far away,” he says. Many people who grew up in the area return after their time in London, attracted by the excellent quality of life and the abundance of outdoor activities, from cycling to open-water swimming in nearby Rutland Water.

For those seeking a peaceful and affordable rural lifestyle, the Welland Valley offers a range of properties, from large period houses with expansive gardens to modern family homes. Notable villages like Medbourne, Lyddington, and Great Easton are among the most sought-after locations. For Denise and Stephen Cable, who moved to Drayton almost two decades ago, the area’s charm and the vibrant local town of Market Harborough were major draws. “The town is thriving, with a great mix of big brands and independent boutiques,” says Denise, who runs a property staging business.

The Welland Valley is a hidden gem, offering a perfect balance of countryside beauty, affordability, and easy access to the hustle and bustle of London. It’s no wonder more people are choosing this picturesque corner of the UK as their home.

The Price of a Stolen Phone: Victims of ‘Cryptomuggings’ Lose Life Savings

The Price of a Stolen Phone: Victims of ‘Cryptomuggings’ Lose Life Savings

Rising Threat of Phone Theft Targets Cryptocurrency Investors, Resulting in Huge Losses

In the UK, phone-snatching incidents have reached epidemic proportions, with over 225 devices stolen daily. For some victims, like Toby Atkinson, the consequences of having their phone swiped go far beyond losing an iPhone. Atkinson, who had been out drinking in Shoreditch, found himself the victim of a “cryptomugging,” a crime where thieves steal smartphones from cryptocurrency investors and drain their accounts of significant sums.

The 30-year-old had spent years investing in digital currencies, turning a small birthday gift into a fortune. However, when his phone was taken, so were his life savings of £750,000, all stored in a crypto app without additional protection. “I chased him down, but I didn’t realise there were two other men behind me. They had a machete and a knife. I was forced to watch as they emptied my accounts,” he recalls, visibly shaken by the ordeal.

Cryptocurrency, being a decentralised form of digital money, is particularly vulnerable to theft. Once the thieves had access to Atkinson’s phone, they could transfer the funds instantly with just the passwords stored on his device. These irreversible transactions make digital currency a prime target for criminals. Experts have warned that such crimes are as damaging as any physical robbery, yet the stolen assets can’t be retrieved once transferred.

Unfortunately, Atkinson’s case is not isolated. Sam Kelly, another victim, had his phone snatched in Hackney while ordering an Uber. Though he chased the thief for several blocks, the criminal managed to escape. Despite Kelly’s quick action to deactivate his accounts, the muggers had already drained his crypto wallets. “I still don’t know how they managed to get in so fast,” says Kelly, who had security measures in place but suspects the thieves accessed his passwords stored on his phone.

Both victims reported their cases to the police, but received little assistance. For Atkinson, no criminal investigation was launched into the theft of his digital assets. Meanwhile, Kelly, despite being more fortunate in recovering part of his losses, found little support from authorities, with his case largely ignored.

The lack of legal protection for digital currency is a major issue in the UK. Unlike traditional bank accounts, which are protected by regulations, cryptocurrency transactions are not regulated, leaving investors vulnerable to such crimes. Despite this, some specialists argue that with the right tools, law enforcement could trace stolen crypto transactions, though time is crucial.

While Kelly was able to recover some of his funds, Atkinson is still grappling with the emotional and financial consequences of the theft. “It wasn’t just the money,” he reflects. “All my personal data, my photos, emails… it’s all gone. I felt completely violated.”

As the threat of cryptomuggings continues to rise, experts urge cryptocurrency investors to take extra precautions, treating their digital assets with the same care as physical money. As for the victims, it’s clear that the cost of these crimes is far greater than just the value of the stolen phone.