Deputy First Minister warns unilateral action on protocol checks would violate the law.

A heated political and legal standoff has arisen in Northern Ireland over Brexit-related port checks, with Deputy First Minister Michelle O’Neill warning that any unilateral attempt by Agriculture Minister Edwin Poots to halt these checks would be unlawful.

Mr Poots has indicated his intention to stop the checks mandated by the Northern Ireland Protocol unless they receive explicit approval from the Stormont Executive. However, Ms O’Neill stated that the responsibility to implement the checks, as agreed by the Executive, rests firmly with the Agriculture Minister.

The controversy intensified after a legal challenge by Unionist Voice Policy Studies argued that the ongoing checks were unlawful without broader Executive approval. In response, Mr Poots plans to present a paper to the Executive seeking a formal decision on their continuation.

Deputy First Minister O’Neill dismissed Mr Poots’ interpretation, emphasising that the legal obligation to enforce the checks remains. She also highlighted that senior civil servants in the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (Daera) are required to uphold the law, even if instructed otherwise by the minister.

“There is a clear legal responsibility on Edwin Poots to implement these checks,” Ms O’Neill said, accusing the DUP of political posturing instead of addressing critical issues such as health waiting lists and pandemic recovery.

First Minister Paul Givan, a DUP colleague of Mr Poots, countered by asserting that there is a “sound legal basis” for halting the checks without Executive consensus. He insisted the current situation is controversial and requires collective approval under Stormont’s rules.

Justice Minister Naomi Long sided with Ms O’Neill, stating that Mr Poots is bound by his legal obligations. She pointed out that similar attempts by Mr Poots in the past had failed, with the UK government affirming the requirement to implement the checks.

“This is not a new issue,” Ms Long stated. “Edwin Poots knows the legal obligation exists. Any move to halt the checks without proper Executive approval would breach the law.”

The DUP’s stance has drawn criticism for exacerbating tensions over the Northern Ireland Protocol, a component of the Brexit deal designed to avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland.

As the debate unfolds, the situation underscores the ongoing challenges of implementing the protocol amid political divisions and legal uncertainties in Northern Ireland.

Edward Reeve’s death prompts investigation, with teenagers set to appear in court.

Two 16-year-old boys have been charged with murder following the death of 35-year-old Edward Reeve in Christchurch. The suspects, one from Christchurch and the other from Bournemouth, are scheduled to appear at Poole Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday.

Emergency services were called to a property on Heath Road at 7:53 PM on 4 January, after Dorset Police received concerns about the welfare of a man. Upon arrival, officers discovered Edward Reeve’s body inside the property.

A 15-year-old girl from Christchurch, arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender, has been released on bail as investigations continue.

Detective Inspector Simon Huxter of Dorset Police’s major crime team stated:
“Following a detailed investigation, the Crown Prosecution Service has authorised charges against the two teenagers. Edward Reeve’s family has been informed, and our thoughts remain with them during this devastating time.”

DI Huxter emphasised that the case is now a matter for the courts, urging the public to refrain from commentary or sharing details online that could jeopardise legal proceedings. Additionally, he reminded the public of legal restrictions prohibiting the identification of individuals under 18, including on social media.

The investigation is ongoing, and authorities have thanked the public for their cooperation and the information provided thus far. Anyone with further relevant details is encouraged to contact Dorset Police.

Three men who murdered the unarmed Black jogger are set to learn their fate, with life imprisonment looming.

The three men convicted of killing 25-year-old Ahmaud Arbery will face sentencing on Friday in Glynn County Courthouse, Georgia. Travis McMichael, Gregory McMichael, and William “Roddie” Bryan Jr., all white, were found guilty of pursuing and fatally shooting Arbery, an unarmed Black man, as he jogged through their neighbourhood in February 2020.

The harrowing incident, partially captured on Bryan’s smartphone, sparked global outrage and intensified demands for racial justice following George Floyd’s murder later that year. The men were convicted in November 2021 of multiple charges, including malice murder, felony murder, and aggravated assault.

Travis McMichael, 35, who fired the fatal shots, was convicted of all nine charges. His father, Gregory McMichael, 65, was found guilty of eight counts, excluding malice murder, while Bryan, 52, was convicted of six counts, including three felony murder charges and false imprisonment.

Under Georgia law, both malice and felony murder convictions carry a mandatory life sentence. However, Judge Timothy Walmsley will decide if the men receive life with or without the possibility of parole. Parole eligibility requires serving at least 30 years in prison.

Additional charges for aggravated assault, false imprisonment, and attempted felony carry sentences ranging from one to 20 years. Prosecutors have stated their intent to seek life imprisonment without parole for all three men.

The sentencing will also include victim impact statements from Arbery’s family. Prosecutors and defence teams are expected to present their arguments before the final decision is made.

The trio also face federal hate crime charges in a separate trial set for February, for which they have pleaded not guilty. These charges could also result in life imprisonment if convicted.

Ahmaud Arbery’s murder remains a pivotal moment in the ongoing fight for racial equality and justice in the United States.

Chelsea’s packed January schedule sparks debate on balancing competition demands and athlete recovery.

Petr Cech has voiced his frustration over the Premier League’s decision to reschedule Chelsea’s match against Brighton, arguing that the fixture pile-up puts player welfare at risk. The game, initially set for 8 February but displaced by the Club World Cup in Abu Dhabi, will now take place on Tuesday, 18 January, adding to an already packed month for the Blues.

Chelsea’s January schedule could now feature up to eight games, including a two-legged Carabao Cup semi-final against Tottenham, FA Cup ties, and critical league matches against Liverpool, Manchester City, and Tottenham. The added strain comes on the heels of a demanding festive fixture period.

Cech, Chelsea’s technical and performance advisor, expressed disappointment over the lack of consideration for recovery time between matches. Writing on the club’s website, he stated:

“Scheduling three games in seven days severely compromises players’ fitness, welfare, and overall wellbeing. We believe more sensible dates for the Brighton fixture were available, such as Wednesday 19 January, which would have ensured fair recovery for both teams.”

Cech highlighted the challenges Chelsea have faced recently, including injuries, illness, and squad depletion, noting that despite these setbacks, the club has met all fixture commitments. He also criticised the imbalance, pointing out that Brighton will play just one additional match in the same seven-day period.

The debate over fixture congestion, particularly for clubs competing in Europe, has intensified amid the ongoing pandemic. While some argue wealthy clubs should rely on academy players and reserves, others, including Cech, warn that compressing games undermines player welfare and the integrity of competitions.

Cech concluded by emphasising the critical role of recovery time for athletes:

“As a former player, I know how much difference even one or two extra days can make. It’s disappointing that recent scheduling decisions fail to reflect this understanding.”

The growing calls for reform highlight the tension between maintaining busy football schedules and prioritising the health of players.

Simpler rules for vaccinated travellers spark optimism among holidaymakers and businesses.

Thousands of travellers arriving in the UK today are set to benefit from newly relaxed Covid-19 restrictions, which took effect at 4 a.m. Fully vaccinated passengers no longer need to provide a negative test before departing for the UK.

Although a post-arrival PCR test is still required on the day of entry or the two following days, travellers no longer have to isolate while awaiting their results. Even more lenient measures will come into effect this Sunday, allowing double-vaccinated visitors to opt for a cheaper lateral flow test instead of a PCR test on day two.

The travel industry has embraced these changes, predicting a significant uptick in holiday bookings. Many companies have reported a sharp rise in website traffic and customer enquiries. Derek Jones, CEO of travel company Kuoni, expressed optimism, forecasting that travel could return to “90 per cent of normal levels by the end of spring.”

These adjustments mark a turning point for the sector, providing relief for both businesses and travellers eager to explore after months of restrictions. Stay updated with the latest developments here.

Despite massive damage, quick action and fortunate timing spared many lives during the disaster.

A devastating wildfire, driven by hurricane-strength winds, swept through two densely populated suburbs near Denver, Colorado, late in the season. While nearly 1,000 homes were destroyed and hundreds more were damaged, only two individuals remain unaccounted for out of the approximately 35,000 residents evacuated. Experts attribute this to a combination of factors, including the timing of the fire and efficient evacuation efforts.

The wildfire ignited during daylight hours on December 30, a critical advantage that allowed residents to see the encroaching flames and smoke. With schools closed for the holidays and many people at home due to pandemic-related remote work, the situation avoided the chaos of parents trying to locate children or rush home.

Pat Sheehan, a University of Utah expert in wildfire management, described the evacuation as “miraculous,” given the proximity to densely populated areas and the extreme wind conditions that spread spot fires rapidly. “For so many to escape safely under such circumstances is incredible,” he remarked.

CHALLENGES WITH ALERT SYSTEMS
While Boulder County’s emergency alert system helped save lives, not everyone received notifications. Many landlines were rendered inoperative by the fire, and cellphone users who had not manually enrolled in the alert system were left uninformed. Neil Noble, a Louisville resident, learned about the fire only when a FedEx driver knocked on his door.

Noble expressed frustration at the lack of widespread alerts, noting that it would be difficult to encourage large numbers of people to sign up for the system. “We were lucky this happened in daylight. At night, the lack of communication could have been deadly,” he said.

Despite these shortcomings, Boulder residents’ familiarity with fire risks along the Front Range prompted many to react quickly. Lori Peek, director of the Natural Hazards Center at the University of Colorado Boulder, noted, “People here understand the growing threat of wildfires, worsened by climate change and urban expansion into fire-prone areas.”

PREPAREDNESS AND COMMUNITY RESPONSE
Local officials were praised for their swift decision to order evacuations as soon as the fire began spreading. This stands in contrast to slower responses in past disasters, such as California’s 2018 Camp Fire, which claimed 85 lives due to delayed evacuation orders.

Boulder County Commissioner Matt Jones highlighted the collaborative efforts of emergency services, crediting them with saving lives and homes. He also acknowledged the human element, describing evacuees as “patient and gracious,” with drivers showing remarkable kindness amid the chaos.

LESSONS LEARNED
The Colorado fire has prompted reflection on the adequacy of suburban preparedness for wildfires, a risk often underestimated in such areas. “This disaster has shown that even seemingly safe suburban locations can face significant hazards,” Peek said, emphasising the importance of community awareness and planning.

As climate change intensifies the frequency and severity of wildfires, experts are calling for improved alert systems and more robust evacuation plans to ensure safety in future emergencies.

Legislation targets those who exploit nursing women, shifting focus from objectification to respect.

Until recently, photographing breastfeeding women in public without their consent was entirely legal. This alarming oversight has finally been addressed, as a new law now criminalises such actions, with offenders facing up to two years in prison and potential placement on the sex offenders register. The reform is a significant victory for campaigners and a step towards reframing societal attitudes towards breastfeeding.

Julia Cooper, a mother from Manchester, spearheaded the movement after confronting a man who was photographing her nursing in a park. Despite her protests, police informed her that the lack of legal privacy protections left her powerless. The incident spurred Labour MPs, including Stella Creasy—herself photographed breastfeeding on public transport—to campaign under the banner Stop the Breast Pest.

This development highlights persistent cultural struggles. Despite its natural purpose, breastfeeding remains tangled in societal notions of breasts as inherently sexual. From Instagram’s ongoing censorship of nipples to airlines requesting mothers to cover up, the discomfort around public nursing is deeply ingrained.

Writer Kate Wills reflects on her own experiences, ranging from stares and unsolicited advice to awkward comments like, “You’re brave!” While never photographed, she empathises with the vulnerability many mothers feel. “It’s mind-blowing that showing a fraction of a breast—often not even the nipple—can provoke such reactions,” Wills says.

Normalising breastfeeding in public requires dismantling harmful perceptions that reduce women’s bodies to objects. Wills recalls how self-conscious she felt in the early days of nursing her baby in public. Over time, she gained confidence, recognising that for her daughter, it was simply a meal—not a source of controversy or shame.

The broader public reaction is mixed. While some individuals have displayed discomfort or curiosity, others have offered indifference or quiet support. Wills notes that many people, from cab drivers to construction workers, seemed unbothered by her breastfeeding.

Campaigners hope the new law will not only deter invasive behaviour but also spark deeper conversations about respecting women’s autonomy. For Wills, the real change lies in society recognising breastfeeding for what it is: a natural, necessary act that deserves protection and respect, not voyeurism or judgment.

Sinn Féin’s motion gains Alliance and SDLP support as educators demand urgent action.

Sinn Féin has proposed recalling the Stormont Assembly early to address the challenges posed by Northern Ireland’s surge in Omicron cases, particularly in schools. The Alliance Party and SDLP have backed the motion submitted by Sinn Féin MLA Pat Sheehan, who called for urgent discussions on reopening schools safely and addressing staff shortages.

Sheehan urged Education Minister Michelle McIlveen to present a clear strategy for the safe return of pupils and teachers, citing rising concerns among educators. “The focus must be on ensuring schools operate safely, protecting staff, pupils, and parents,” he stated, highlighting increased pressure from the Omicron variant.

BACKGROUND AND REACTIONS
Teachers’ unions have warned that reopening classrooms without additional measures could escalate virus transmission. They have raised issues related to staffing levels and contact tracing inadequacies. Minister McIlveen, while maintaining that keeping children in schools is a priority, has said her department is collaborating with the Department of Health and schools on Covid-related concerns.

Alliance MLA Chris Lyttle, chair of the Education Committee, stressed the importance of safety. “We want all pupils in schools, but it must be done safely,” he said, pointing to the need for better ventilation and measures to address staff shortages.

SDLP MLA Daniel McCrossan described the situation in schools as “dire.” He criticised the lack of preparation, saying, “School leaders are being forced to make last-minute decisions due to inadequate direction from the minister and her department.”

McCrossan proposed creating a reserve list of substitute teachers to cover for staff isolating due to Covid and called for a thorough review of current mitigation measures, including ventilation improvements.

ASSEMBLY RECALL PROCESS
The Assembly, currently in recess until January 17, can be recalled by a motion signed by 30 members. With Sinn Féin’s 27 MLAs and backing from Alliance and the SDLP, the required threshold has been met.

The motion follows mounting public pressure for clearer guidance on school safety and protocols for events like open days.

PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT
Colm Gildernew, chair of the Health Committee, also voiced concerns, stating that the Omicron wave is straining staffing across multiple sectors, including healthcare and education. He has requested the Health Committee’s recall to hear directly from Minister Robin Swann about the government’s response.

“The latest figures are alarming,” Gildernew said, emphasising the urgency of addressing staff absences and ensuring robust measures to contain the virus.

As Northern Ireland grapples with rising cases and significant challenges in schools, the recall of the Assembly could provide a critical platform for addressing these pressing issues.

Resignation leaves the country’s fragile transition to democracy hanging in the balance.

Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok’s decision to resign has intensified Sudan’s political uncertainty, complicating the country’s ongoing transition to democratic governance. In a televised address, Hamdok announced his resignation on Sunday, citing his inability to establish political consensus after an October 25 military coup that disrupted the transitional government.

Hamdok called for immediate dialogue to devise a roadmap for completing Sudan’s transition to democracy. His departure comes after more than two years of progress following the 2019 overthrow of Omar al-Bashir, who ruled Sudan for three decades under an Islamist regime.

WHAT LED TO THIS POINT?
On October 25, 2021, Sudan’s military dissolved the transitional government, detaining Hamdok and several other officials. The coup, led by General Abdel-Fattah Burhan, dismantled the Sovereign Council, a joint civilian-military ruling body established in 2019.

Burhan announced the military would oversee the country until elections in mid-2023, proposing a technocratic government in the interim. International condemnation followed swiftly, with the U.S. suspending $700 million in aid. Hamdok was reinstated in November as part of a controversial agreement that sidelined the pro-democracy movement but aimed to stabilise the political landscape.

Despite his reinstatement, Hamdok struggled to form a government amid widespread protests. These demonstrations opposed both military control and his compromise with the generals. Since the coup, nearly 60 people have been killed in clashes with security forces, with reports of severe human rights violations, including sexual violence.

THE PRO-DEMOCRACY MOVEMENT
The Forces for the Declaration of Freedom and Change, a coalition central to Sudan’s pro-democracy movement, remains divided. Some groups aligned with the military, while others, including the Sudanese Professionals Association and the Resistance Committees, rejected any collaboration with the generals, insisting on full civilian rule.

Hamdok’s inability to bridge the gap between these factions and the military further deepened the crisis, leaving the transitional government paralysed.

WHAT’S NEXT FOR SUDAN?
Sudan faces a precarious future. Protest groups continue to demand full civilian leadership, but the military remains steadfast, with Burhan reiterating that power will only transition to an elected government.

The U.N. envoy for Sudan, Volker Perthes, has called for inclusive talks to break the deadlock. Meanwhile, the U.S. has urged leaders to find consensus, stressing adherence to the 2019 constitutional declaration as a basis for appointing a new prime minister and Cabinet.

Cameron Hudson, a Sudan expert at the Atlantic Council, highlighted the need for international mediation to achieve political compromise and chart a path forward.

In his resignation speech, Hamdok warned that Sudan’s political stalemate could escalate into a severe crisis, further threatening the country’s fragile economy. “Our nation is at a dangerous crossroads,” he said, urging for urgent action to salvage the transition and safeguard Sudan’s future.

Defender earns praise after a 709-day absence with a stellar performance against Wolves.

Phil Jones made a triumphant return to Manchester United’s starting lineup after nearly two years, earning accolades for his impressive display against Wolves. The 29-year-old defender, sidelined for 709 days due to a knee injury and subsequent struggles, was thrust into action on Monday at Old Trafford, partnering Raphael Varane due to injuries to Harry Maguire, Eric Bailly, and Victor Lindelof.

Jones’ last appearances came in January 2020 during an FA Cup victory over Tranmere and a Premier League defeat to Burnley, marking the longest gap between league matches for a United player who remained with the club during such an interval.

His performance drew widespread praise from both teammates and management. Luke Shaw lauded Jones’ resilience, telling Sky Sports, “Phil Jones has faced constant criticism for years, but he’s remained professional and worked tirelessly. Tonight, he was phenomenal. For someone who’s been out for over a year, this was a remarkable comeback.”

Interim manager Ralf Rangnick also commended Jones, highlighting his commitment and effort. “There was no doubt about his attitude,” Rangnick told BBC Sport. “Considering he hasn’t played in two years, it was an excellent performance.”

Despite Jones’ standout effort, United fell to a 1-0 defeat, courtesy of Joao Moutinho’s decisive goal. Shaw acknowledged the team’s need to improve but emphasised the significance of Jones’ return. “He deserves respect for what he’s been through. He was exceptional tonight,” said Shaw.

Jones’ return serves as a testament to his perseverance and professionalism, earning respect from fans and colleagues alike in what could signal a fresh start for the veteran defender.