Sadiq Khan aims to revitalise Oxford Street with plans for partial pedestrianisation, challenging the Westminster council’s approach.

Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, has announced plans to take charge of Oxford Street’s future, accusing Westminster council of failing to revitalise the iconic shopping thoroughfare. Khan expressed his dissatisfaction with the current state of the street, stating that the council’s efforts have been inadequate to address the area’s decline.

In an interview following the launch of a public consultation on Oxford Street’s future, Khan criticised the council for not making the most of the street’s strategic importance. “Oxford Street is vital for both businesses and visitors,” he said, stressing the need to restore its status as a national asset.

The mayor proposes a new “mayoral development corporation” to oversee the transformation of Oxford Street, with plans to gradually remove traffic from parts of the street. This move comes after ongoing concerns from the Labour-led Westminster council, which Khan claims was previously an obstacle to progress. He is optimistic that the council will now support his vision for change, particularly given the street’s deteriorating condition and the rise of vacant, low-quality stores.

The proposed transformation includes plans for partial pedestrianisation, although full implementation would require further consultations and government approval. The consultation, set to run for nine weeks, seeks feedback on the principle of pedestrianising the street, as well as the establishment of the mayoral development corporation. Khan has also indicated interest in gaining control over parts of Oxford Street currently under Camden council’s jurisdiction.

Khan believes that Oxford Street has been negatively affected by factors such as the pandemic and the growth of online shopping. He envisions the area as a thriving, green, and accessible destination for both Londoners and tourists, suggesting that significant changes could improve air quality and reduce road dangers. While his proposals include pedestrianising certain sections of Oxford Street, he has not ruled out further transformations depending on the outcomes of the consultation process.

However, Westminster council has expressed reservations, stating that the establishment of a mayoral development corporation is not necessary. The council is willing to collaborate with Khan’s team, but it is committed to ensuring that the plans align with the needs of local residents and businesses.

The consultation documents propose a phased pedestrianisation plan that would start with the section between Oxford Circus and Orchard Street. Although Khan’s vision does not immediately include the full pedestrianisation of Oxford Street, he acknowledges that the area must evolve into a world-class public space to remain relevant in a changing retail landscape.

The project is expected to cost £150 million, but Khan has assured Londoners that the financial burden will not fall on taxpayers. He plans to explore private funding sources, including business contributions, developer input, and potential new revenue streams like advertising. Additionally, the mayor’s office is considering a new levy on businesses in the area to help cover the costs of the transformation.

While some critics argue that pedestrianisation alone will not solve the street’s problems, Khan remains focused on his long-term vision for Oxford Street. His proposals aim to make it a flagship destination that Londoners and visitors can take pride in, with benefits for local businesses, the economy, and the environment.

Nvidia posts strong revenue growth, driven by AI demand, with its data centre GPUs continuing to fuel the surge.

Nvidia has exceeded Wall Street’s revenue expectations for Q4 FY25, reporting a total of US$39.33 billion (S$52.76 billion), outperforming the forecasted US$38.05 billion. The company’s adjusted earnings per share (EPS) were US$0.89, surpassing the anticipated US$0.84. Despite these strong results, Nvidia’s stock remained flat in extended trading, as reported by CNBC.

For the quarter, Nvidia’s net income surged to US$22.09 billion, or US$0.89 per share, compared to US$12.29 billion, or US$0.49 per share, from the same period last year. However, the company’s gross margin saw a slight decline of three percentage points from the previous year, dropping to 73%. This reduction was attributed to the rising costs of newer, more complex products in its data centre line.

Looking ahead, Nvidia is forecasting a revenue of approximately US$43 billion for the first quarter of FY2026, marking a 65% annual increase, although lower than the 262% growth experienced in the same quarter last year. This projection exceeds analysts’ expectations of US$41.78 billion, indicating continued strong demand, particularly for its data centre graphics processing units (GPUs).

The surge in Nvidia’s performance is largely driven by the growing demand for its AI chips, with the company’s revenue increasing by 78% year-on-year for the quarter and 114% for the full fiscal year, reaching US$130.5 billion. In 2024, Nvidia’s revenue tripled in Q4, pushing the company past Apple and Microsoft to become the world’s most valuable company, a title it reclaimed in late January 2025. However, analysts have noted that the company’s growth has started to slow as it expands.

A major focus for Nvidia this year is the roll-out of its next-generation AI processors, Blackwell, with its latest AI chip generating US$11 billion in sales during Q4. CEO Jensen Huang referred to the demand for the Blackwell chip as “amazing” and highlighted the company’s success in ramping up production. He also noted that AI advancements are accelerating rapidly, with AI technologies set to revolutionise industries on a massive scale.

Nvidia’s CFO, Colette Kress, emphasised that Blackwell sales are expected to experience significant growth, describing it as the fastest product ramp in the company’s history. Large cloud service providers have been the primary drivers of sales, representing around 50% of Nvidia’s data centre revenue. As a result, Nvidia’s data centre division now accounts for 91% of its total revenue, up from 83% a year ago.

In Q4, Nvidia’s data centre business generated US$35.6 billion in revenue, a 93% increase from the previous year, surpassing analysts’ expectations of US$33.65 billion. This division has seen a tenfold increase in revenue over the past two years, primarily driven by AI-related demand.

While competition in the AI space intensifies, with some companies like DeepSeek in China using fewer Nvidia chips, the company remains confident in its market position. Nvidia believes that its new chips, like Blackwell, are crucial for advancing AI inference, which involves delivering AI software, a process that requires substantially more computational power than training.

Nvidia remains unfazed by the potential threat posed by custom chips from competitors such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. Jensen Huang expressed that having a chip design does not guarantee successful deployment, suggesting Nvidia’s dominance in the field remains strong.

Nurse accuses colleague of exclusion during tea breaks, leading to a tribunal award after a long-standing dispute at St Helier Hospital.

A nurse has been awarded £41,000 following a tribunal decision after accusing a colleague of excluding her from a morning tea round, which she described as part of a wider pattern of bullying behaviour. Susan Hamilton, a former diabetes nurse at St Helier Hospital in Sutton, south London, claimed that dietician Abdool Nayeck displayed a dismissive attitude toward her following a disagreement over patient care in 2018.

According to Ms Hamilton, Nayeck began to ignore her during meetings and refused to make tea for her, while continuing to serve the rest of the team. She alleged that this treatment worsened after Nayeck bluntly told her, “I don’t like you,” which she said marked the beginning of the conflict between them.

Although hospital management intervened and encouraged the pair to engage in polite and civil communication, Ms Hamilton maintained that the situation did not improve. She claimed that Nayeck not only continued to exclude her from the tea rounds but also ignored the rest of the team at times. The dispute, she said, contributed to significant stress, leading her to leave her position in 2019. She later returned in 2021 and lodged a formal complaint against the hospital’s handling of the matter.

The tribunal ruled that Ms Hamilton’s grievances against the trust were justified, finding that they had failed to take sufficient action against Nayeck’s behaviour. The judge remarked that Ms Hamilton’s evidence showed the considerable emotional distress caused by the situation, which ultimately led to her resignation. The one claim of abuse against Nayeck, however, was dismissed.

Judge Kathryn Ramsden concluded that the trust’s lack of adequate action had contributed to Ms Hamilton’s illness, noting that she had once been a passionate and gifted nurse who was deeply distressed by the circumstances she found herself in.

Mayor’s growth plan aims to inject £11,000 into every Londoner’s pocket by 2035 through key infrastructure and innovation investments.

Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, has launched a new economic growth plan aimed at revitalising the capital’s economy, with the bold claim that it could increase the average Londoner’s pre-tax income by £11,000. Unveiled this Thursday, the “London Growth Plan” sets out an ambitious strategy to restore productivity growth in the city, targeting an increase of 2% annually over the next decade. If successful, this could boost London’s economy by £107 billion by 2035, according to estimates from City Hall.

The plan outlines several key components, including major investments in housing and infrastructure, such as extending the Bakerloo line, DLR, and Overground, as well as proposals to devolve suburban rail services to Transport for London (TfL). These moves are seen as essential for driving future growth and addressing the productivity stagnation that has plagued the capital since the financial crisis of 2008. Between 1998 and 2007, London’s productivity grew by an average of 3.16% annually, but this fell sharply to just 0.12% between 2008 and 2022.

Khan’s plan also includes ambitious goals for job creation, aiming to generate 150,000 new jobs in the city. Additionally, the strategy highlights the development of “industrial innovation corridors” in various parts of London, such as the WestTech Corridor and the Thames Estuary. These corridors are designed to foster collaboration between high-growth sectors like AI, life sciences, and climate tech.

One of the major funding initiatives in the plan is a £21 million package from the UK Shared Prosperity Fund to support regeneration in town centres across the capital. The plan also proposes the creation of a publicly-owned High Street Estate Agency to bring vacant properties back into use. A new London Tech and Inclusive Growth Fund is also on the cards, offering up to £100 million in loan and equity funding to support small and mid-sized enterprises.

While Khan hailed the plan as a “golden opportunity” to unlock London’s full potential, critics have expressed concerns about its feasibility. Conservative members at City Hall questioned the plan’s chances of success, citing the national budget’s impact on growth and the potential negative effects of tax increases. The plan’s critics argue that London’s financial future will be shaped not only by local policies but also by the broader national economic environment.

Antonia Jennings, CEO of the Centre for London think tank, highlighted the need for a new financial settlement for London, noting that the city’s government currently has limited capacity to generate its own revenue compared to other global cities. To effectively implement the growth plan, she argued, London needs greater financial autonomy.

Despite these challenges, Khan remained optimistic, stressing that the plan is about more than just economic growth. It is a blueprint for creating a fairer, more prosperous London that benefits all its residents, with a focus on improving living standards, increasing public service investments, and ensuring that growth reaches every corner of the city.

The capital will enjoy extended sunshine spells as a dreary winter comes to an end, with temperatures rising and brighter days ahead.

After one of the greyest winters in recent memory, London is preparing for ten days of sunshine, bringing relief to residents as spring approaches. Following a particularly dreary start to the year, the weather is set to improve with a stretch of bright spells, according to BBC Weather.

London is forecast to experience nearly a week of sunshine, with some brief drizzle expected on March 7, before the sun returns. A bout of heavy rain is anticipated on Wednesday, but once it clears, sunny weather is predicted to take over until March 8. Temperatures could rise to 13°C by next Wednesday, with night-time temperatures staying above zero, bringing an end to the colder nights.

Commuters will finally be able to enjoy their regular travel in the daylight, with sunrises around 6:45 am and sunsets at 5:50 pm.

This bright weather comes after Londoners endured one of the gloomiest winters in years. Earlier in February, some parts of the city went without sunshine for over a week, a rare occurrence that hadn’t been seen in nearly 50 years. Southern England only had around 1.5 hours of sunshine per day during the 72 days of winter.

However, relief is in sight, as the Met Office has also predicted a dry and sunny week ahead. After Wednesday’s rainfall, the weather will settle, with clear days and frosty and foggy nights. The end of meteorological winter on Friday is expected to bring even milder and sunnier conditions, though some light snow may still be seen over higher ground in the north.

The coming days are sure to brighten spirits as spring finally begins to make its mark.

Climate Change Committee calls for a 25% reduction in meat and 20% reduction in dairy to help meet the UK’s net-zero target.

Britons have been urged to reduce their meat consumption by 25% and dairy by 20% by 2040 to help the UK meet its climate targets, according to the Climate Change Committee (CCC). The CCC, which advises the government on climate issues, has outlined a plan to reduce the country’s greenhouse gas emissions by 87% by 2040 and ultimately achieve net zero emissions by 2050.

To achieve these targets, the public would need to cut back on their meat intake, which is described as equivalent to giving up two fry-ups or doner kebabs a week. Dr Emily Nurse from the CCC explained that this reduction in meat and dairy consumption would contribute significantly to cutting emissions from the agricultural sector and also help free up land for tree planting and peatland restoration, which would help absorb carbon.

While the committee’s plan involves a shift in dietary habits, it stresses that this does not mean people need to adopt a vegan lifestyle. However, it calls for a significant reduction in livestock numbers, which is expected to decrease by 27% by 2040, compared to 2023 levels.

Farmers have expressed concern over these recommendations, arguing that the UK’s environmentally friendly meat production should take precedence over meat imports from regions with higher carbon footprints.

In addition to dietary changes, households are encouraged to make eco-conscious decisions such as purchasing electric cars and installing heat pumps to replace gas boilers, which would contribute significantly to reducing carbon emissions. According to the CCC’s projections, these changes could result in savings of around £700 per year on heating bills and another £700 on motoring costs.

The CCC also proposes a variety of other measures, including increased tree planting, peatland restoration, renewable energy expansion, and greater responsibility for the aviation industry in reducing emissions. The committee’s recommendations aim to guide the UK in meeting its climate goals and achieving a more sustainable future.

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband confirmed that the government will review the advice and consider the proposed measures.

Energy, water, council tax, transport, and broadband costs are all set to rise, adding further strain to residents already struggling with the cost of living.

As April approaches, London residents are bracing themselves for a wave of financial pressures, with multiple bills set to rise across various sectors. From energy and water prices to council tax, transport fares, broadband, and mobile bills, many will see their outgoings increase, adding to the already heavy cost-of-living burden.

The energy price cap is expected to rise by £111 on average, which will increase household energy bills by 6.4% starting April 1. This follows a spike in wholesale energy prices, exacerbated by cold weather and reduced renewable energy generation. Households on standard variable tariffs are advised to explore alternative deals and discounts.

Additionally, water bills for Thames Water customers are set to rise by 31%, with some households facing an annual bill increase of up to £203. Across England and Wales, average water bills will rise by 26%, the most significant hike since the privatisation of the water industry.

Council tax is also going up, with 22 of London’s 33 boroughs seeing band D bills exceeding £2,000. The average increase in council tax across the capital is around £90, with some areas, such as Kingston, experiencing bills approaching £2,500.

Public transport fares are not spared, with Tube and rail fares set to increase by an average of 4.6% in March. While bus and tram fares remain frozen, the increased revenue will be reinvested into Transport for London (TfL) services.

In the telecommunications sector, both broadband and mobile prices are rising, with customers of Vodafone, EE, and Sky facing increases ranging from £1.50 to £4 per month. Sky’s broadband and TV package customers can expect an average hike of 6.2% starting April 1.

Finally, alcohol duties have already seen an increase earlier this month, with new tax structures raising prices on wines and spirits, particularly those with higher alcohol content.

Charities have voiced concern about the combined effect of these price hikes, warning that they will significantly impact vulnerable households, including those with children and those already in debt.

Fatal crash at bus stop leaves one dead, including a child, and raises concerns over dangerous driving

A tragic crash in Harrow, northwest London, has resulted in the death of a woman and left two others injured after a collision involving a London bus and a car. The incident occurred on Bessborough Road at around 9:20pm on Monday, with the victims waiting at a bus stop at the time.

The woman, believed to be in her 40s, was pronounced dead at the scene. Among the injured, a nine-year-old child was rushed to the hospital, though their injuries are not life-threatening. Two other pedestrians were also taken to a hospital, but their conditions are not considered critical.

The driver of the car, who remained at the scene, was arrested on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving and remains in custody.

Emergency services were quick to respond to the scene, with multiple resources including ambulance crews, paramedics, and a trauma team from London’s Air Ambulance. Sadly, despite the efforts of medical staff, one of the victims could not be saved.

Authorities have appealed to the public for any witnesses or dashcam footage from the incident. Road closures were in place temporarily but have since been lifted as the investigation continues.

Anyone with information is encouraged to contact the police or Crimestoppers.

Residents voice concerns over potential return to Soho’s past, while others support preserving its nightlife identity.

Plans to open a new adult entertainment venue in Soho’s Walker’s Court have sparked controversy, with some residents worried it could revive the area’s former red-light district reputation.

The Penthouse Club, an international chain with locations in the United States, Australia, and Russia, has applied to open at the former Madame JoJo’s site. While the club promises a high-end experience featuring live music, drag acts, and acrobatic performances, its proposed full-nudity striptease shows have drawn criticism.

Opponents argue that Soho’s evolving character now attracts families and tourists, making a late-night adult venue unsuitable. A local resident wrote in an objection letter to Westminster City Council, stating: “Soho is no longer the seedy red-light district of old. Do we really want strip club clientele mixing with families exploring the area?”

Another resident raised concerns about safety, particularly for women walking alone at night. “Soho already feels unsafe in the evenings. Adding a 300-capacity venue where patrons spill out onto the streets at 3 am will only make things worse.”

Despite the backlash, supporters insist Soho is the perfect place for such a venue. A resident in favour of the proposal commented: “This club could help protect the unique nightlife culture that makes Soho famous, especially in an era of increasing gentrification.”

The club’s president, Caroline Kirkendoll, defended the project, highlighting an £8 million investment into an empty building. She emphasised that the club would host diverse events beyond traditional strip performances.

Under the proposed licensing terms, full nudity would be restricted to private VIP rooms, while topless and semi-nude performances would be allowed on the main stage and at tables.

Westminster Council is set to review the application in a Thursday morning hearing, where the future of this controversial Soho venue will be decided.

Neighbours divided as furniture and exercise equipment take over common walkway.

A resident’s decision to fill a shared corridor with personal belongings has stirred debate online, with opinions split between resourcefulness and selfishness.

A social media post featuring images of a residential corridor cluttered with furniture, plants, and gym equipment asked whether the resident was making smart use of the space or unfairly occupying a communal area. The discussion quickly gained traction, drawing mixed reactions.

The post described how some viewed the resident’s actions as harmless, praising the creative use of otherwise empty space. Others, however, criticised it as inconsiderate, arguing that shared areas should not be monopolised and raising concerns over fire hazards and blocked access panels.

One commenter, taking a light-hearted approach, remarked: “I don’t mind, as long as I can do the same without complaints.” However, a community enforcement officer had a firmer stance: “If it violates SCDF regulations, it should be removed immediately.”

Others compared the situation to panic buying, where one person’s advantage leads to scarcity for others. “This space should be for everyone. By taking over, the resident creates an unfair situation where only they benefit,” another commenter wrote.

Safety concerns were also raised. “A table blocking maintenance access is a problem. A cupboard in a shared walkway could become a fire hazard. If this is allowed, what stops others from doing the same?” one user pointed out.

Despite the heated discussion, some questioned whether the resident’s actual neighbours had raised complaints. “If those living there have no issue with it, does it really matter what outsiders think?”

The debate highlights a broader question: where do we draw the line between personal convenience and respect for shared spaces?