Only a fraction of pensioners receive the full £900 increase, with many receiving less

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak recently claimed that his government had raised the state pension by £900, but a closer look at the facts reveals that only a small portion of pensioners actually saw such an increase.

As of April 9, 2024, those receiving the full new state pension saw their annual payments rise by £900, but this applies to only around 1.5 million people out of the 12.6 million pensioners in total.

There are two types of state pension: the basic state pension for those who reached pension age before April 6, 2016, and the new state pension for those who reached it after that date. The full new state pension increased by 8.5% this year, boosting weekly payments from £203.85 to £221.20, equating to a £902.20 annual rise – roughly in line with Mr. Sunak’s claim.

However, those receiving the basic state pension saw a smaller increase. The highest payment for the old-style pension rose from £156.20 to £169.50 per week, a £691.60 yearly increase, which is less than what was suggested.

According to data from the Department for Work and Pensions, in November 2022, there were 9.58 million people on the basic state pension, compared to 3.06 million on the new state pension, with only around 1.53 million receiving the full amount.

The remaining new state pension recipients receive reduced weekly amounts, depending on their national insurance contributions over their lifetime. This means that a significant proportion of pensioners did not benefit from the full £900 increase.

These figures, based on November 2022 data, could have changed in the past 18 months as more people reached pension age, including those now residing abroad, though Northern Ireland cases are not included.

Despite new law, experts warn the government’s changes do not address key issues for leaseholders

Reforms to the leasehold and freehold systems in England and Wales have recently passed into law, but critics argue the changes fall short of what is needed to truly transform the system. The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act was fast-tracked through Parliament as the General Election approached, with both government and opposition leaders agreeing to push it through at the last minute.

The new legislation is intended to make it easier and cheaper for individuals to extend their leases, purchase their freeholds, and take control of property management. However, many campaigners have voiced concerns that it does not go far enough.

Lord Bailey of Paddington, a Conservative peer, expressed his dissatisfaction with the reforms, calling the Act “suboptimal” and stating that it is not the “revolution” that leaseholders across the country have been hoping for.

Labour’s Lord Kennedy of Southwark echoed these sentiments, labelling the legislation a failure and accusing the government of breaking promises. He criticised the slow progress of the bill and the lack of significant reforms, particularly regarding ground rents and forfeiture, which were excluded from the final draft.

Conservative peers, however, defended the Bill, with Lord Gascoigne arguing it was a positive step forward. But some Tory members expressed frustration over the speed at which the legislation was being rushed through Parliament, with Lord Howard of Rising condemning the process as a “disgrace” and warning that critical precedents were being set without adequate scrutiny.

The rushed timeline and the exclusion of key measures from the Bill have sparked concerns that parts of the legislation could face legal challenges in the future. Other proposed reforms, such as the Renters Reform Bill, were also dropped during the final days of the session.

Despite the disappointments, the government insists the legislation marks an important milestone in reforming leasehold law, with further improvements expected in the future.

Powerful twister topples turbines and sparks fire, but experts stress such events are highly unusual

A tornado has caused significant damage to a wind farm in southwest Iowa, toppling five large wind turbines and even igniting one in flames. The rare and extreme event has raised questions about the resilience of wind farms in the face of such severe weather, though experts highlight that this type of damage is uncommon.

The devastating footage from the MidAmerican Energy Company’s Orient wind farm near Greenfield, Iowa, showed the powerful tornado ripping through the landscape, uprooting trees, and sending debris flying. The wind speed at several of the turbines was recorded at over 100 mph just before they were destroyed.

MidAmerican Energy, which has been operating wind farms since 2004, referred to the event as an “unprecedented impact” on its wind fleet. Despite occasional incidents of tornadoes and hurricanes damaging wind turbines in the past, Jason Ryan of the American Clean Power Association pointed out that such occurrences are rare.

Wind turbines are typically situated far from populated areas, reducing the likelihood of direct hits. The U.S. is home to almost 73,000 operational turbines, with many located in the “wind belt” stretching from Texas to the Dakotas, including parts of Iowa. These areas, however, are also prone to tornadoes, particularly during springtime.

Meteorologist Jennifer Thompson from the National Weather Service noted the overlap between regions with frequent tornado activity and the areas where wind farms are concentrated.

While wind turbines are designed to endure high winds, tornadoes—especially powerful EF4 or EF5 storms—are an exceptional challenge. Engineering professor Sri Sritharan of Iowa State University explained that turbines are not designed to withstand direct hits from such extreme tornadoes.

Although turbine designs account for factors such as high wind speeds, this rare event may lead to updates in industry standards. Sritharan suggested that committees may reassess their design codes in light of the recent damage.

Investigation details remain undisclosed as FBI agents search Hinds County DA’s office and private business

FBI agents carried out a raid on the office and personal business of Hinds County District Attorney Jody Owens in Jackson, Mississippi, on Wednesday. However, the federal agency has remained tight-lipped about the reasons behind the operation.

Agents spent several hours at Owens’ private cigar bar, Downtown Cigar Co., and also conducted a search at his office within the Hinds County Courthouse. Despite the extensive search, FBI spokesperson Marshay Lawson confirmed that the rationale for the raid remains confidential, as the affidavit supporting the federal search warrants has been sealed by the court.

Owens, who has served as the district attorney since 2019, acknowledged the raid but refrained from offering any specifics about the investigation. In a statement, Owens assured the public that his office was fully cooperating with the FBI, and operations at the Hinds County District Attorney’s Office would continue as normal.

Before his tenure as district attorney, Owens had worked as the lead attorney for the Southern Poverty Law Center, a civil rights organisation known for its advocacy in legal battles involving justice reform. His campaign for district attorney focused on addressing violent crime and exploring alternatives to incarceration for nonviolent offenders.

During his time in office, Jackson has faced rising crime rates, with some sources indicating the highest murder rate in the country. Owens has drawn support from Republican lawmakers to enhance the city’s crime-fighting efforts, including increased funding to hire more prosecutors. The state-run Capitol Police, controlled by Republican Governor Tate Reeves, has also expanded its presence in Jackson, sparking controversy among local Democrats, who argue that these measures represent a disproportionate influence of state control over the city.

In 2022, Owens was involved in an incident where Capitol Police cited him for simple assault, a misdemeanor, after an alleged altercation with a visitor. Owens denied the allegations at the time, asserting that he had acted lawfully. The recent FBI raid adds another layer of mystery to the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Owens’ actions and public office.

Former presidential candidate backs Trump despite previous rivalry, signalling her continued involvement in GOP politics.

Nikki Haley has confirmed that she will vote for Donald Trump in the upcoming 2024 election, despite previously being one of his key rivals in the Republican race. The former governor of South Carolina made the announcement during a speech at the Hudson Institute in Washington, following her exit from the presidential race earlier this year.

“I will be voting for Trump,” Haley stated during a question-and-answer session. While showing her support, she also reiterated her earlier comments about Trump’s need to connect with the millions of voters who had backed her campaign.

Haley used the opportunity to criticise the current president, Joe Biden, labelling his leadership a “catastrophe.” She went on to challenge Biden’s stance on Israel and questioned the US’s commitment to Ukraine, drawing attention to his inconsistency in foreign policy.

Although Haley’s voters have continued to show their preference for her in the primaries, signalling some reluctance towards fully supporting Trump, her endorsement marks a significant shift. Trump’s campaign now faces a challenge to unite the party, as Haley’s followers have shown a hesitant stance towards backing the former president, especially with ongoing legal trials surrounding him.

Her backing of Trump also suggests she plans to remain a prominent figure in GOP politics, a contrast to other centre-right Republicans who have distanced themselves from the former president. However, her decision to support Trump in the upcoming election raises questions about the GOP’s future direction, especially after her previous remarks about the former president’s impact on the party.

Despite her endorsement, reports indicate that Trump’s campaign has not made substantial efforts to reach out to Haley and her allies, indicating potential tensions within the party as it prepares for the 2024 race.

With key injuries mounting, Scotland’s Euro 2024 hopes face a challenge as several crucial players are sidelined.

Scotland has been dealt a significant blow ahead of Euro 2024, with key players ruled out due to injuries. The Tartan Army will be without right-backs Nathan Patterson and Aaron Hickey, as confirmed by assistant manager John Carver.

Patterson, who plays for Everton, sustained a hamstring injury during a match against Chelsea last month, and will require surgery. Brentford’s Hickey, also a right-back, has been sidelined since October due to a similar injury sustained in a match at Stamford Bridge.

This double blow follows the unfortunate news that Lewis Ferguson has also been ruled out of the tournament after suffering serious damage to his cruciate ligament. Carver acknowledged the significant loss, stating, “It’s three crucial players, all of whom have been vital in our recent qualifiers.”

The injury crisis has left Steve Clarke with a gap to fill in the squad. Celtic’s Anthony Ralston, the only other right-sided wing-back available, had been included in recent friendlies against the Netherlands and Northern Ireland, but the team will have to find alternatives.

Versatile Bristol City player Ross McCrorie, who has previously played as a right-back, was a late addition to the squad. Additionally, experienced players such as Stephen O’Donnell and Celtic’s James Forrest have featured in the wing-back position for Scotland, though O’Donnell has not been in the squad for two years, and Forrest’s last involvement was during the previous European Championship.

Carver also attended Aberdeen’s 4-0 victory over Hibernian, where right-backs Nicky Devlin and Chris Cadden both played, although Carver was primarily there to observe midfielder Connor Barron.

The loss of these key players leaves Scotland’s Euro 2024 campaign looking uncertain, with Clarke’s squad now needing to adapt and find replacements for these crucial positions.

Despite Brexit fears, the UK’s financial sector continues to thrive, reinforcing London’s dominance in Europe.

Despite the predictions of many who feared Brexit would significantly harm the UK’s financial services, London’s status as Europe’s leading financial hub remains unshaken. While some critics predicted a mass exodus of financial institutions from the City, the reality has been quite different. In fact, London’s position at the heart of global finance is not only intact but strengthened.

Almost eight years after the referendum, it’s clear that Brexit has had little detrimental impact on the Square Mile. While some European rivals may attempt to challenge London’s dominance, cities like Frankfurt are far from offering a serious alternative, often best known for their cultural events rather than their financial prowess.

Recent findings from EY highlight that the UK has widened its lead over other European destinations for financial services investment. In 2023, the UK attracted 108 financial services projects, a significant rise from 2022’s 76. In contrast, France, which came second, secured just 39 projects, underscoring London’s enduring appeal.

Anna Anthony, the UK’s financial services managing partner at EY, remarked, “Not only did the UK maintain its lead in the financial services sector, but it also expanded it considerably.”

Of course, challenges remain. The stock market has struggled, and the flotation market is far from active, with the UK’s stock exchange still trailing New York. However, the stock market is only one facet of the City. The insurance and bond markets continue to perform strongly, and despite a rocky period under former Prime Minister Liz Truss, the bond market has remained resilient.

As a technology hub, London still has room for improvement, but it far outpaces its European counterparts, including Paris and Frankfurt. The City of London’s deep-rooted financial infrastructure, diversity of services, and global connectivity ensure its continued dominance.

The City’s financial sector still has a wealth of advantages, and it’s important to frequently recognise its ongoing success.

Grooming Gangs Taskforce has rescued 4,000 children and led to hundreds of arrests in its fight against child sexual exploitation.

In its inaugural year, the Grooming Gangs Taskforce has made significant strides in tackling child sexual exploitation, leading to over 550 arrests of suspected child predators. Established in April 2023 by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, the taskforce has also been instrumental in safeguarding more than 4,000 victims from sexual abuse across England and Wales.

The taskforce, a specialist unit comprised of highly skilled officers and experts, collaborates with all 43 police forces in the region. Their focus is on preventing grooming gangs and enhancing investigations into child sexual exploitation. The success of this initiative has been a result of the team’s commitment and collaboration with local law enforcement.

Home Secretary James Cleverly visited Essex Police’s headquarters on Monday, praising the ongoing efforts of the police forces involved. He stated, “When children are being abused, we must use every available resource to protect them. In just one year, the taskforce’s dedication, together with local policing efforts, has not only resulted in more than 550 arrests but also ensured the safety of thousands of children.”

Cleverly also highlighted further measures in the government’s ongoing efforts to combat such abuse. Through the Criminal Justice Bill, all professionals will be legally required to report suspected abuse to the police, while sex offenders will no longer be able to evade justice by changing their names.

The taskforce, backed by the National Crime Agency and led by the National Police Chiefs’ Council, functions as a permanent, operational police unit funded by the Home Office. Its primary mission is to enhance how police forces investigate grooming gangs and protect vulnerable children from abuse.

With more than 400 officers trained in this field, the taskforce plans to increase its presence and mobilise additional officers over the coming months to continue identifying and apprehending child sex offenders.

Mark Russell, CEO of The Children’s Society, spoke about the importance of providing safe spaces for children, enabling them to heal and offer crucial evidence in the judicial process. He also praised the ongoing collaboration between charities, the police, and other organisations.

Gabrielle Shaw, CEO of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood (Napac), added her support, noting the importance of integrating victims’ voices into the taskforce’s work. Shaw emphasised that the ultimate goal is to ensure that victims are heard, believed, and supported, with justice processes designed to meet their needs.

The collaborative efforts between law enforcement agencies, charities, and governmental bodies continue to make significant strides in protecting children from abuse, while also respecting the unique needs and experiences of victims. The taskforce remains committed to its mission of safeguarding children and dismantling grooming gangs.

California’s largest teachers union voices strong opposition to the governor’s budget proposal, claiming it could result in devastating long-term effects on education.

California’s largest teachers union is intensifying its opposition to Governor Gavin Newsom’s budget proposal, arguing that the plan will “wreak havoc” on school funding and jeopardise the future of public education in the state.

On Friday, the California Teachers Association (CTA) announced a public campaign aimed at blocking elements of Newsom’s budget strategy, which the union claims will lead to a loss of nearly $12 billion in education funding in the coming years, despite Newsom’s assurances that public schools would be shielded from immediate cuts.

While Newsom maintains that his complex accounting approach would protect schools from $8.8 billion in cuts, CTA President David Goldberg voiced strong concern, saying that this would result in a substantial long-term financial burden on school districts. Goldberg emphasized that if the campaign did not succeed in halting the plan, the union would not rule out legal action. “We will not stand by and let this happen,” Goldberg stated, confirming that a lawsuit could be an option if the public campaign fails.

This marks a turning point in Newsom’s political tenure, as he has largely avoided major disputes with core constituencies, including educators, in the past. The governor, who is often considered a potential presidential candidate, has been facing increasing challenges in addressing California’s growing budget deficit, which is projected to be around $45 billion, with some estimates suggesting it could reach $55 billion.

The ongoing fiscal struggles have been exacerbated by a significant shortfall in tax revenue, with state collections falling 25% short of expectations in the 2022-23 fiscal year. The gap has led to a reassessment of how public education funds are allocated, with Newsom’s administration arguing that the state only owed schools $67 billion, despite a previous budget allocation of $76 billion for the 2022-23 year.

In a bid to avoid massive layoffs and cuts, Newsom’s proposal allows schools to retain the excess funds but with the understanding that they will not be formally accounted for in the state’s budget until the 2025-26 fiscal year. Critics argue this strategy is misleading and financially irresponsible, with experts claiming that it could artificially inflate the state’s budget while burdening future budgets with the deferred costs.

Opponents, including Karen Getman, a school funding expert, warn that the plan undermines Proposition 98, the voter-approved formula that determines public education funding in California. By postponing the recognition of the $8.8 billion, the formula would be recalculated, potentially resulting in an additional $12 billion reduction in school budgets over the next two years.

Though Newsom defended his proposal as a temporary solution to avoid immediate disruptions, critics, including Kevin Gordon, a lobbyist for California school districts, believe the governor should focus on finding a more sustainable solution. Gordon suggested that Newsom negotiate with school districts to suspend the funding formula, allowing schools to recoup the funds over time.

The Legislative Analyst’s Office has also expressed disapproval of Newsom’s approach, describing it as “bad fiscal policy” that could lead to more difficult financial decisions down the line.

Despite the mounting opposition, Newsom stands by his proposal, arguing that it ensures the protection of public schools while addressing the state’s fiscal challenges. “We respectfully disagree with that position,” Newsom said in response to the criticism.

A sharp temperature drop catches Chileans off guard, with the country experiencing its chilliest autumn in 74 years due to a rare cold front.

A sudden and unexpected cold front has gripped South America, bringing Chile its coldest May in over 70 years. The drastic shift in weather, occurring just days after sunny temperatures saw Chileans lounging in T-shirts, has left many scrambling to bundle up against the biting cold.

This unusually early cold snap has caused temperatures to plummet along Chile’s coast and in the capital, Santiago, where records have been broken. With temperatures nearing freezing, May 2023 marks the coldest the country has experienced since 1950, according to Chile’s meteorological agency.

Meteorologists explain that an unusual series of polar air masses has swept across the southern parts of the continent, pushing temperatures below zero degrees Celsius (32°F) in some areas. This sudden shift is part of a broader pattern of extreme weather events, which experts believe are being exacerbated by climate change.

Raul Cordero, a climatologist at Santiago University, commented, “This is one of the longest cold fronts ever recorded and also one of the earliest before winter begins in the Southern Hemisphere. Typically, cold air incursions from Antarctica don’t occur until June.”

This chilly front, which originated from Antarctica, collided with warm air from the north, causing severe rainstorms in Brazil. The heavy rains have further compounded the weather situation, with flooding affecting several regions of the country.

In response to the unexpected cold, the Chilean government issued weather alerts and stepped up support for homeless individuals who are struggling to survive the harsh conditions. The snow-capped peaks of the Andes and snowfalls in parts of Santiago have caused power outages throughout the week.

Street vendor Mercedes Aguayo, who sells gloves and hats in Santiago, noted the sudden spike in demand for winter clothing. “Winter came early,” she said. “I’m happy for the boost in business after last year’s record heatwave.”

This cold front also caught Argentina and Paraguay off guard, with energy demand soaring across Argentina. To prevent shortages, gas distributors in multiple provinces had to cut supplies to certain industries and gas stations.