Eric Wynalda Suggests Tension Between Graham Potter and Christian Pulisic

Eric Wynalda, a former United States international, has claimed that Chelsea manager Graham Potter “just doesn’t like” Christian Pulisic. The assertion comes amidst ongoing discussions about the American forward’s role at the club under Potter’s management.

Pulisic had previously expressed optimism about the change in management, hoping that replacing Thomas Tuchel with Potter would mark the beginning of a new chapter. However, despite his enthusiasm, Pulisic has had limited game time, with just one start under the new manager so far.

The 24-year-old had already been unsettled during Tuchel’s tenure, and he seriously considered leaving Chelsea after receiving interest from Manchester United. With the World Cup approaching, Pulisic sought more consistent first-team opportunities, something he believed was crucial for his international ambitions.

In contrast, Potter has made it clear that his focus is not on preparing players specifically for the World Cup, as his primary concern is building a well-balanced team for Chelsea’s broader objectives. The manager has a variety of attacking options at his disposal, making Pulisic’s position in the squad uncertain.

Wynalda, speaking to VegasInsider, shared his perspective on the situation: “Graham Potter has made many positive comments about Pulisic, saying he’s a good player and a great guy. However, the reality is that Potter just doesn’t seem to like him. If Pulisic is coming down the hallway, Potter reportedly looks for the nearest exit to avoid him, refusing to engage with him.”

This comment adds fuel to growing speculation about the strained relationship between Pulisic and Potter, with many questioning how much of an impact this could have on the player’s future at Chelsea.

The luxury fashion brand cuts ties with the rapper after his controversial comments spark backlash.

Luxury fashion label Balenciaga has officially severed ties with Kanye West following his recent series of antisemitic comments. The move makes Balenciaga the latest high-profile company to distance itself from the rapper and fashion mogul.

A spokesperson for Kering, Balenciaga’s parent company, confirmed the brand would no longer be working with West, who now goes by the name Ye. “Balenciaga has no longer any relationship nor any plans for future projects related to this artist,” the statement issued on Thursday read.

Earlier this year, West collaborated with Balenciaga’s creative director, Demna Gvasalia, on the Yeezy Gap Engineered by Balenciaga collection. He also made an appearance at the brand’s Paris Fashion Week show, but images of the 45-year-old rapper walking the runway have since been removed from Balenciaga’s website.

The decision follows increasing pressure from organisations like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), who addressed Adidas in an open letter on Thursday, urging the company to end its partnership with West’s Yeezy footwear line. The ADL condemned West’s comments as hateful and called on Adidas to make a public statement rejecting antisemitism.

Earlier this month, Adidas had already stated that its collaboration with West’s Yeezy brand was “under review” prior to the emergence of his controversial remarks. Since then, the retailer has remained silent on the matter.

The committee seeks answers from the former president about his role in the Capitol riot, demanding records and sworn testimony.

The committee investigating the January 6 US Capitol riot has officially subpoenaed former President Donald Trump, demanding both testimony and documents as part of their inquiry into the events surrounding the attack. The panel claims that Mr Trump was directly responsible for orchestrating an effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

In a formal letter sent on Friday, the committee accused Mr Trump of playing a central role in inciting a mob of his supporters to storm the Capitol. The attack, which saw rioters clash with police using weapons like batons, sledgehammers, and metal pipes, aimed to block Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s election victory.

The subpoena, signed by Chairman Bennie Thompson and Vice Chair Liz Cheney, requires Mr Trump to provide testimony under oath by November 14. It also demands a series of documents, including communications with members of Congress and extremist groups.

“We recognise that a subpoena to a former president is an unprecedented action,” the committee leaders wrote, acknowledging the gravity of their decision. “We do not take this step lightly.”

As of now, Trump’s legal team has yet to respond to the subpoena. The committee asserts that it has gathered “overwhelming evidence” suggesting that Mr Trump personally sought to undo his electoral defeat. This allegedly involved spreading false claims of voter fraud, pressuring the Justice Department, and attempting to convince state officials, Congress members, and even his vice president to alter the election outcome.

Despite this evidence, critical information about Mr Trump’s actions and statements during the riot remains unclear, and the committee insists that only Mr Trump can provide the missing details. The bipartisan panel, consisting of seven Democrats and two Republicans, unanimously voted in favour of issuing the subpoena.

The subpoena follows a recent development involving Steve Bannon, a former advisor to Mr Trump, who was sentenced to four months in prison after refusing to cooperate with the committee’s investigation. Bannon, a key figure in Trump’s 2016 campaign, has been closely involved with the rise of nationalist populism in Europe, endorsing leaders like Marine Le Pen and Matteo Salvini.

Manager’s departure comes after poor start to the season leaves Villa near the relegation zone.

Aston Villa have dismissed manager Steven Gerrard, just hours after a crushing 3-0 loss to Fulham. The defeat, which saw Villa finish the match with a red card, an own goal, and a conceded penalty, left the team languishing just above the relegation zone with only two wins in their first 11 games of the season.

Gerrard, who took charge of the club less than a year ago after a successful spell at Rangers, was given the sack despite his earlier promise. The club released a brief statement thanking him for his “hard work and commitment” and wishing him well in the future.

Following the loss at Craven Cottage, Gerrard remained defiant, telling reporters: “I’m a fighter, I will never quit anything. But the reality is that it’s not good enough for this club.” Within the hour, however, the club made the decision to part ways with the 41-year-old.

The search for his replacement has already begun, with former Tottenham manager Mauricio Pochettino emerging as a leading contender. The club’s owners are reportedly keen to secure a top-tier coach, with Pochettino, a popular figure, being eyed as the ideal candidate. Another name in the frame is Thomas Tuchel, who was dismissed by Chelsea earlier in the season and is eager to return to Premier League management.

The actress shares the emotional challenges and rewards of being the first female Doctor, as she prepares to pass on the mantle.

Jodie Whittaker has revealed the emotional toll and profound impact of playing the iconic Doctor Who, admitting that the experience was far more “emotionally challenging” than she had initially anticipated. Whittaker, who made history as the first woman to portray the Doctor, described the role as “so much more than a role” and spoke about the heartbreak of seeing fellow castmates leave during her time on the show.

Taking over from Peter Capaldi, Whittaker portrayed the 13th Doctor from 2017 until her final episode, The Power of the Doctor, set to air on October 23. Throughout her tenure, she was joined by co-stars such as Mandip Gill, Bradley Walsh, Tosin Cole, and John Bishop. Whittaker recalled how the experience of working alongside them was incredibly fulfilling, despite the emotional challenges of the changing cast dynamics.

In an interview with The Big Issue, Whittaker shared her feelings on the role: “It’s a whole world. And it’s the most exciting world to be in,” she said. She added that she had been swept up in the euphoria of playing the Doctor, something she never expected would be so emotionally taxing. Yet, Whittaker found beauty in the role’s fluidity, noting how she could “hand it on” and become a fan of the show once more, anticipating where the story would go next.

Although her casting sparked some online controversy due to the female portrayal of a character traditionally played by men, Whittaker said she always felt supported. Reflecting on her time in the role, she expressed no regrets. “I would have loved it if my last season had been me, Mandip, and John, plus Brad and Tosin. When those guys left, I found it really heartbreaking – it was like breaking up the band. But then we got a great new band member. So it’s not a regret, just a petulant child who doesn’t like change.”

Whittaker will be succeeded by Sex Education star Ncuti Gatwa, who she praised as “far more qualified than me” to take on the legendary role.

To read the full interview with Jodie Whittaker, pick up this week’s The Big Issue magazine.

The pension fund crisis triggered by recent economic policies contributes to significant financial setbacks for major City institutions

Schroders, a historic name in the City of London, has seen its assets fall by a staggering £21 billion over just three months, highlighting the financial havoc caused by political instability and the crisis in UK pension funds. The company’s assets dropped from £773 billion to £752 billion between July and September, with the pension fund crisis, triggered by the controversial mini-budget, playing a major role in the losses.

The pension fund chaos was sparked when the government’s fiscal decisions led to a panic sell-off of British bonds. This prompted a dramatic plunge in the gilt market, which, in turn, forced the Bank of England to intervene to prevent further collapse. Schroders, known for its reputation as a stable and well-managed institution since its founding in 1804, was not immune to this financial storm. The company’s reliance on liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies, used by pension funds to balance assets and liabilities, left it vulnerable when the market crashed.

Despite the severe setback, Schroders chose not to provide further comment beyond its stock market announcement, and CEO Peter Harrison declined to speak to the media. Over the past year, the company’s shares have halved in value, now standing at 375p.

Schroders’ plight mirrors the broader struggles within the City, as other firms also face significant financial challenges. Jupiter Fund Management, for example, reported £600 million in client withdrawals last quarter. While this could be viewed as a positive sign of recovery within the business, Jupiter’s assets have also fallen by £11 billion this year, now standing at £49 billion. New CEO Matthew Beesley acknowledged the broader global economic pressures, but pointed to the UK government’s fiscal policies as a particular source of difficulty.

The ongoing turmoil, exacerbated by geopolitical instability and rising inflation, has seen Jupiter’s shares drop by 63% this year. The situation in the City remains tense, with institutions like Schroders and Jupiter feeling the full brunt of the economic turbulence.

Despite his popularity, Styles’ latest album lacks originality when compared to other 2022 contenders

The 2022 Mercury Prize saw a stellar array of nominees, from Little Simz’s audacious Sometimes I Might Be Introvert to Sam Fender’s socially conscious Seventeen Going Under, and Gwenno’s evocative Tresor. Yet, one name on the shortlist raised eyebrows: Harry Styles.

While Styles’ desire for artistic acclaim following his boyband days is understandable, his efforts in this direction fall short. His solo career has been marked by an almost overwhelming reliance on the sounds and styles of his musical idols, rather than developing a unique voice of his own. From his debut album, where he made overt references to Elton John, The Beatles, and Prince, Styles has often seemed more like a musical magpie, collecting influences rather than creating something truly original.

This tendency persists on Harry’s House, where the title itself references Joni Mitchell’s 1975 song “Harry’s House / Centrepiece”, but Styles’ interpretation feels hollow in comparison. The record, with its careful blend of Seventies and Eighties sounds, lacks the emotional depth and spontaneity found in Mitchell’s work. The polished brass of “Music for a Sushi Restaurant” and the easygoing vibe of “Daydreaming” feel calculated and uninspired. There’s a sense of detachment, in stark contrast to the raw energy of contemporaries like Little Simz or Yard Act, whose music feels more urgent and alive.

One could argue that all music is influenced by what came before it, but Styles’ approach seems to lack the inventiveness that would elevate these influences into something fresh. Where Ed Sheeran is often criticised for leaning heavily on his musical inspirations, Styles somehow escapes similar scrutiny, despite his tracks feeling like weak imitations of superior artists. He doesn’t seem to offer much beyond what we’ve already heard from the likes of Bowie or Prince, leaving him with no discernible sound of his own.

Moreover, Styles’ lyrical content often falls flat. His songs, such as “Cinema”, offer little substance, with shallow lines that fail to captivate. His attempt to express deep emotions or offer profound commentary is hindered by a lack of clarity or depth, a problem that extends beyond his music into his public persona. In interviews, Styles often appears unfocused, such as his cringeworthy comments during the Don’t Worry Darling press tour, which raised doubts about his engagement with the art he creates.

Ultimately, while Styles has undeniable star power and a loyal fanbase, his inclusion on the Mercury Prize shortlist feels more like a result of his fame than his musical innovation. His brand of slick, stylistic pop offers little in the way of originality when compared to the bold, genre-defying work of his fellow nominees. For all its charm, Harry’s House is a record with style, but precious little substance.

Despite being a divisive figure, Cole’s presence spans all ten episodes of the season

In a season full of character shifts and time jumps, House of the Dragon has seen numerous characters come and go. While some major figures were noticeably absent in certain episodes, one character has remained consistently present throughout all ten episodes: Ser Criston Cole, portrayed by Fabien Frankel.

Many fans might have expected figures like Rhaenyra or Daemon Targaryen to be the only ones to appear in every episode, but they were missing in the ninth episode, which focused on the coronation of King Aegon II. Instead, it was Cole who appeared in all episodes, standing out as the only character to do so.

Frankel’s portrayal of Cole has been a subject of mixed reactions. While the actor is praised for his performance, his character’s descent into villainy has earned him a less favourable reception from fans. In episode nine, fans were particularly vocal, calling for Cole’s demise after his morally questionable actions, only to see him face no immediate consequences.

There has also been a recurring joke among viewers regarding Cole’s apparent lack of ageing throughout the series. Despite several significant time jumps, Frankel’s character appears unchanged, even as other characters have been recast to reflect their growing years.

The season finale of House of the Dragon will air in the UK on Sky Atlantic on Monday, 24 October, at 2am, with a repeat showing later at 9pm.

Sales of Pirates of the Caribbean-themed outfits soar after defamation verdict

Following his defamation trial against ex-wife Amber Heard, there has been a significant increase in demand for Johnny Depp’s Captain Jack Sparrow Halloween costumes. Depp, known for portraying the eccentric pirate in five Pirates of the Caribbean films, has seen a 90 per cent rise in sales of costumes resembling his iconic character, according to reports from TMZ.

The surge in costume sales comes after a highly publicised legal battle, where Depp was awarded $10 million (£8 million) in compensatory damages and $5 million (£4 million) in punitive damages. The case centred around a 2018 op-ed written by Heard in The Washington Post, in which she implied Depp had abused her. The jury ruled that Heard defamed Depp, although she was granted $2 million (£1.6 million) from a countersuit, after the jury determined one of Depp’s lawyers had defamed her by labelling her abuse allegations a “hoax.”

In the wake of the trial’s verdict, Depp has re-entered the public eye, and his role as Captain Jack Sparrow has gained even more prominence. Halloweencostumes.com, one of the world’s largest costume retailers, reported that sales of two Jack Sparrow-themed outfits have skyrocketed, with one costume priced between $85 and $95 (£75 to £84) and the other ranging from $245 to $299 (£216 to £264). Stocks of these costumes have already been nearly depleted, with more than 85 per cent of the stock gone.

Notably, Depp’s character has outperformed costumes from other popular films released this year, including Top Gun: Maverick, Hocus Pocus 2, and Lightyear.

Meanwhile, Amber Heard has signalled her intention to appeal the defamation verdict, submitting a four-page court document last week. Her legal team argues that the jury’s decision was “inherently and irreconcilably inconsistent.”

House Committee to Force Ex-President to Testify as Investigation Into January 6th Riot Intensifies

Former US President Donald Trump may soon be subpoenaed by the House of Representatives to testify under oath about the January 6, 2021, Capitol Hill riot. Representative Jamie Raskin, a Democrat on the House committee leading the investigation, confirmed that the subpoena could be issued within days. This move follows a unanimous 9-0 vote by the committee to compel Trump to provide both documents and testimony in relation to his alleged role in instigating the violence during the Capitol attack, which aimed to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

The decision marks a significant escalation in the ongoing investigation, which had previously been uncertain about whether to subpoena Trump or former Vice President Mike Pence. Neither Trump nor Pence have directly engaged with the committee thus far.

Trump has consistently dismissed the investigation, both publicly and in legal forums, referring to the committee as “a laughing stock” on his Truth Social platform. Despite his likely refusal to cooperate, invoking his Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination, the committee could still force him to testify in a closed-door deposition. This could be a drawn-out process, especially given the committee’s expected conclusion by the end of the year, with Republicans aiming to dissolve it after gaining control of the House in the midterm elections.

Trump’s potential defiance of the subpoena would add to his growing list of legal troubles, including ongoing civil and criminal investigations in New York related to his business dealings, and federal probes concerning the handling of classified documents and the 2020 election. A failure to comply with a congressional subpoena can result in imprisonment for up to 12 months, under a law dating back to 1857.