Chelsea’s packed January schedule sparks debate on balancing competition demands and athlete recovery.

Petr Cech has voiced his frustration over the Premier League’s decision to reschedule Chelsea’s match against Brighton, arguing that the fixture pile-up puts player welfare at risk. The game, initially set for 8 February but displaced by the Club World Cup in Abu Dhabi, will now take place on Tuesday, 18 January, adding to an already packed month for the Blues.

Chelsea’s January schedule could now feature up to eight games, including a two-legged Carabao Cup semi-final against Tottenham, FA Cup ties, and critical league matches against Liverpool, Manchester City, and Tottenham. The added strain comes on the heels of a demanding festive fixture period.

Cech, Chelsea’s technical and performance advisor, expressed disappointment over the lack of consideration for recovery time between matches. Writing on the club’s website, he stated:

“Scheduling three games in seven days severely compromises players’ fitness, welfare, and overall wellbeing. We believe more sensible dates for the Brighton fixture were available, such as Wednesday 19 January, which would have ensured fair recovery for both teams.”

Cech highlighted the challenges Chelsea have faced recently, including injuries, illness, and squad depletion, noting that despite these setbacks, the club has met all fixture commitments. He also criticised the imbalance, pointing out that Brighton will play just one additional match in the same seven-day period.

The debate over fixture congestion, particularly for clubs competing in Europe, has intensified amid the ongoing pandemic. While some argue wealthy clubs should rely on academy players and reserves, others, including Cech, warn that compressing games undermines player welfare and the integrity of competitions.

Cech concluded by emphasising the critical role of recovery time for athletes:

“As a former player, I know how much difference even one or two extra days can make. It’s disappointing that recent scheduling decisions fail to reflect this understanding.”

The growing calls for reform highlight the tension between maintaining busy football schedules and prioritising the health of players.

Simpler rules for vaccinated travellers spark optimism among holidaymakers and businesses.

Thousands of travellers arriving in the UK today are set to benefit from newly relaxed Covid-19 restrictions, which took effect at 4 a.m. Fully vaccinated passengers no longer need to provide a negative test before departing for the UK.

Although a post-arrival PCR test is still required on the day of entry or the two following days, travellers no longer have to isolate while awaiting their results. Even more lenient measures will come into effect this Sunday, allowing double-vaccinated visitors to opt for a cheaper lateral flow test instead of a PCR test on day two.

The travel industry has embraced these changes, predicting a significant uptick in holiday bookings. Many companies have reported a sharp rise in website traffic and customer enquiries. Derek Jones, CEO of travel company Kuoni, expressed optimism, forecasting that travel could return to “90 per cent of normal levels by the end of spring.”

These adjustments mark a turning point for the sector, providing relief for both businesses and travellers eager to explore after months of restrictions. Stay updated with the latest developments here.

Legislation targets those who exploit nursing women, shifting focus from objectification to respect.

Until recently, photographing breastfeeding women in public without their consent was entirely legal. This alarming oversight has finally been addressed, as a new law now criminalises such actions, with offenders facing up to two years in prison and potential placement on the sex offenders register. The reform is a significant victory for campaigners and a step towards reframing societal attitudes towards breastfeeding.

Julia Cooper, a mother from Manchester, spearheaded the movement after confronting a man who was photographing her nursing in a park. Despite her protests, police informed her that the lack of legal privacy protections left her powerless. The incident spurred Labour MPs, including Stella Creasy—herself photographed breastfeeding on public transport—to campaign under the banner Stop the Breast Pest.

This development highlights persistent cultural struggles. Despite its natural purpose, breastfeeding remains tangled in societal notions of breasts as inherently sexual. From Instagram’s ongoing censorship of nipples to airlines requesting mothers to cover up, the discomfort around public nursing is deeply ingrained.

Writer Kate Wills reflects on her own experiences, ranging from stares and unsolicited advice to awkward comments like, “You’re brave!” While never photographed, she empathises with the vulnerability many mothers feel. “It’s mind-blowing that showing a fraction of a breast—often not even the nipple—can provoke such reactions,” Wills says.

Normalising breastfeeding in public requires dismantling harmful perceptions that reduce women’s bodies to objects. Wills recalls how self-conscious she felt in the early days of nursing her baby in public. Over time, she gained confidence, recognising that for her daughter, it was simply a meal—not a source of controversy or shame.

The broader public reaction is mixed. While some individuals have displayed discomfort or curiosity, others have offered indifference or quiet support. Wills notes that many people, from cab drivers to construction workers, seemed unbothered by her breastfeeding.

Campaigners hope the new law will not only deter invasive behaviour but also spark deeper conversations about respecting women’s autonomy. For Wills, the real change lies in society recognising breastfeeding for what it is: a natural, necessary act that deserves protection and respect, not voyeurism or judgment.

Despite massive damage, quick action and fortunate timing spared many lives during the disaster.

A devastating wildfire, driven by hurricane-strength winds, swept through two densely populated suburbs near Denver, Colorado, late in the season. While nearly 1,000 homes were destroyed and hundreds more were damaged, only two individuals remain unaccounted for out of the approximately 35,000 residents evacuated. Experts attribute this to a combination of factors, including the timing of the fire and efficient evacuation efforts.

The wildfire ignited during daylight hours on December 30, a critical advantage that allowed residents to see the encroaching flames and smoke. With schools closed for the holidays and many people at home due to pandemic-related remote work, the situation avoided the chaos of parents trying to locate children or rush home.

Pat Sheehan, a University of Utah expert in wildfire management, described the evacuation as “miraculous,” given the proximity to densely populated areas and the extreme wind conditions that spread spot fires rapidly. “For so many to escape safely under such circumstances is incredible,” he remarked.

CHALLENGES WITH ALERT SYSTEMS
While Boulder County’s emergency alert system helped save lives, not everyone received notifications. Many landlines were rendered inoperative by the fire, and cellphone users who had not manually enrolled in the alert system were left uninformed. Neil Noble, a Louisville resident, learned about the fire only when a FedEx driver knocked on his door.

Noble expressed frustration at the lack of widespread alerts, noting that it would be difficult to encourage large numbers of people to sign up for the system. “We were lucky this happened in daylight. At night, the lack of communication could have been deadly,” he said.

Despite these shortcomings, Boulder residents’ familiarity with fire risks along the Front Range prompted many to react quickly. Lori Peek, director of the Natural Hazards Center at the University of Colorado Boulder, noted, “People here understand the growing threat of wildfires, worsened by climate change and urban expansion into fire-prone areas.”

PREPAREDNESS AND COMMUNITY RESPONSE
Local officials were praised for their swift decision to order evacuations as soon as the fire began spreading. This stands in contrast to slower responses in past disasters, such as California’s 2018 Camp Fire, which claimed 85 lives due to delayed evacuation orders.

Boulder County Commissioner Matt Jones highlighted the collaborative efforts of emergency services, crediting them with saving lives and homes. He also acknowledged the human element, describing evacuees as “patient and gracious,” with drivers showing remarkable kindness amid the chaos.

LESSONS LEARNED
The Colorado fire has prompted reflection on the adequacy of suburban preparedness for wildfires, a risk often underestimated in such areas. “This disaster has shown that even seemingly safe suburban locations can face significant hazards,” Peek said, emphasising the importance of community awareness and planning.

As climate change intensifies the frequency and severity of wildfires, experts are calling for improved alert systems and more robust evacuation plans to ensure safety in future emergencies.

Sinn Féin’s motion gains Alliance and SDLP support as educators demand urgent action.

Sinn Féin has proposed recalling the Stormont Assembly early to address the challenges posed by Northern Ireland’s surge in Omicron cases, particularly in schools. The Alliance Party and SDLP have backed the motion submitted by Sinn Féin MLA Pat Sheehan, who called for urgent discussions on reopening schools safely and addressing staff shortages.

Sheehan urged Education Minister Michelle McIlveen to present a clear strategy for the safe return of pupils and teachers, citing rising concerns among educators. “The focus must be on ensuring schools operate safely, protecting staff, pupils, and parents,” he stated, highlighting increased pressure from the Omicron variant.

BACKGROUND AND REACTIONS
Teachers’ unions have warned that reopening classrooms without additional measures could escalate virus transmission. They have raised issues related to staffing levels and contact tracing inadequacies. Minister McIlveen, while maintaining that keeping children in schools is a priority, has said her department is collaborating with the Department of Health and schools on Covid-related concerns.

Alliance MLA Chris Lyttle, chair of the Education Committee, stressed the importance of safety. “We want all pupils in schools, but it must be done safely,” he said, pointing to the need for better ventilation and measures to address staff shortages.

SDLP MLA Daniel McCrossan described the situation in schools as “dire.” He criticised the lack of preparation, saying, “School leaders are being forced to make last-minute decisions due to inadequate direction from the minister and her department.”

McCrossan proposed creating a reserve list of substitute teachers to cover for staff isolating due to Covid and called for a thorough review of current mitigation measures, including ventilation improvements.

ASSEMBLY RECALL PROCESS
The Assembly, currently in recess until January 17, can be recalled by a motion signed by 30 members. With Sinn Féin’s 27 MLAs and backing from Alliance and the SDLP, the required threshold has been met.

The motion follows mounting public pressure for clearer guidance on school safety and protocols for events like open days.

PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT
Colm Gildernew, chair of the Health Committee, also voiced concerns, stating that the Omicron wave is straining staffing across multiple sectors, including healthcare and education. He has requested the Health Committee’s recall to hear directly from Minister Robin Swann about the government’s response.

“The latest figures are alarming,” Gildernew said, emphasising the urgency of addressing staff absences and ensuring robust measures to contain the virus.

As Northern Ireland grapples with rising cases and significant challenges in schools, the recall of the Assembly could provide a critical platform for addressing these pressing issues.

Resignation leaves the country’s fragile transition to democracy hanging in the balance.

Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok’s decision to resign has intensified Sudan’s political uncertainty, complicating the country’s ongoing transition to democratic governance. In a televised address, Hamdok announced his resignation on Sunday, citing his inability to establish political consensus after an October 25 military coup that disrupted the transitional government.

Hamdok called for immediate dialogue to devise a roadmap for completing Sudan’s transition to democracy. His departure comes after more than two years of progress following the 2019 overthrow of Omar al-Bashir, who ruled Sudan for three decades under an Islamist regime.

WHAT LED TO THIS POINT?
On October 25, 2021, Sudan’s military dissolved the transitional government, detaining Hamdok and several other officials. The coup, led by General Abdel-Fattah Burhan, dismantled the Sovereign Council, a joint civilian-military ruling body established in 2019.

Burhan announced the military would oversee the country until elections in mid-2023, proposing a technocratic government in the interim. International condemnation followed swiftly, with the U.S. suspending $700 million in aid. Hamdok was reinstated in November as part of a controversial agreement that sidelined the pro-democracy movement but aimed to stabilise the political landscape.

Despite his reinstatement, Hamdok struggled to form a government amid widespread protests. These demonstrations opposed both military control and his compromise with the generals. Since the coup, nearly 60 people have been killed in clashes with security forces, with reports of severe human rights violations, including sexual violence.

THE PRO-DEMOCRACY MOVEMENT
The Forces for the Declaration of Freedom and Change, a coalition central to Sudan’s pro-democracy movement, remains divided. Some groups aligned with the military, while others, including the Sudanese Professionals Association and the Resistance Committees, rejected any collaboration with the generals, insisting on full civilian rule.

Hamdok’s inability to bridge the gap between these factions and the military further deepened the crisis, leaving the transitional government paralysed.

WHAT’S NEXT FOR SUDAN?
Sudan faces a precarious future. Protest groups continue to demand full civilian leadership, but the military remains steadfast, with Burhan reiterating that power will only transition to an elected government.

The U.N. envoy for Sudan, Volker Perthes, has called for inclusive talks to break the deadlock. Meanwhile, the U.S. has urged leaders to find consensus, stressing adherence to the 2019 constitutional declaration as a basis for appointing a new prime minister and Cabinet.

Cameron Hudson, a Sudan expert at the Atlantic Council, highlighted the need for international mediation to achieve political compromise and chart a path forward.

In his resignation speech, Hamdok warned that Sudan’s political stalemate could escalate into a severe crisis, further threatening the country’s fragile economy. “Our nation is at a dangerous crossroads,” he said, urging for urgent action to salvage the transition and safeguard Sudan’s future.

Defender earns praise after a 709-day absence with a stellar performance against Wolves.

Phil Jones made a triumphant return to Manchester United’s starting lineup after nearly two years, earning accolades for his impressive display against Wolves. The 29-year-old defender, sidelined for 709 days due to a knee injury and subsequent struggles, was thrust into action on Monday at Old Trafford, partnering Raphael Varane due to injuries to Harry Maguire, Eric Bailly, and Victor Lindelof.

Jones’ last appearances came in January 2020 during an FA Cup victory over Tranmere and a Premier League defeat to Burnley, marking the longest gap between league matches for a United player who remained with the club during such an interval.

His performance drew widespread praise from both teammates and management. Luke Shaw lauded Jones’ resilience, telling Sky Sports, “Phil Jones has faced constant criticism for years, but he’s remained professional and worked tirelessly. Tonight, he was phenomenal. For someone who’s been out for over a year, this was a remarkable comeback.”

Interim manager Ralf Rangnick also commended Jones, highlighting his commitment and effort. “There was no doubt about his attitude,” Rangnick told BBC Sport. “Considering he hasn’t played in two years, it was an excellent performance.”

Despite Jones’ standout effort, United fell to a 1-0 defeat, courtesy of Joao Moutinho’s decisive goal. Shaw acknowledged the team’s need to improve but emphasised the significance of Jones’ return. “He deserves respect for what he’s been through. He was exceptional tonight,” said Shaw.

Jones’ return serves as a testament to his perseverance and professionalism, earning respect from fans and colleagues alike in what could signal a fresh start for the veteran defender.

Former president and his eldest children face subpoenas in investigation of alleged financial misconduct.

Donald Trump, alongside his children Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr., has been subpoenaed by New York Attorney General Letitia James as part of an investigation into alleged financial fraud within the Trump Organisation. The subpoenas demand both testimony and documents related to the family business, which encompasses over 500 entities owned by the Trumps.

The Attorney General’s office filed these subpoenas to compel cooperation in the civil probe investigating whether the Trump Organisation manipulated property valuations to secure loans or reduce tax liabilities. While Eric Trump, another of the former president’s children, was questioned in 2020, the latest legal filings reveal that Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump have resisted complying with the orders.

The probe centres on whether the Trump Organisation inflated property values to secure advantageous loans or understated them to benefit from tax reductions. The investigation began over two years ago and has intensified following multiple refusals to cooperate.

Attorney General James is also seeking a deposition from Donald Trump, proposing early January as a potential date. However, the former president and his legal team have denounced the investigation as a “political witch-hunt,” citing it as a tactic driven by James’s alleged political ambitions.

In response, the Trump Organisation issued a statement condemning the investigation as unethical and accusing the Attorney General of neglecting pressing issues in New York State. The statement framed the inquiry as a “travesty to the legal system.”

The legal dispute is expected to escalate, with Trump and his children likely filing motions to quash the subpoenas. Additionally, Donald Trump has launched a federal lawsuit against James, claiming the investigation violates his constitutional rights and is an attempt to tarnish his reputation.

Attorney General James remains firm in her pursuit, stating, “No one is above the law.” Her office has yet to confirm if the investigation will lead to further legal actions, but she expressed confidence in uncovering the truth.

This ongoing legal battle highlights the broader scrutiny surrounding the Trump Organisation’s financial practices and the political implications of high-profile investigations.